MoseSchrute
Well-Known Member
So great it is going to be even louder. Too bad they took out the three rows closest to the field.
Doing that would have kept the capacity over 70,000 too.So great it is going to be even louder. Too bad they took out the three rows closest to the field.
Maybe Barta will tear out 3,500 seats and put the tank of the water tower in the south bleachers.How bout the fact that they're going to tear out the water tower in a few years when they build the rest of the children's hospital?
They appear to be putting up supports for the video board.
Does it also look like those gaudy-ass railings are 7 feet tall when you compare them to the construction workers? The more I see this thing come together the more I don't like it. There's more tunnels, stairs, and railings that there is seating area.
How does Iowa keep fucking up every major stadium/arena project???
They appear to be putting up supports for the video board.
Does it also look like those gaudy-ass railings are 7 feet tall when you compare them to the construction workers? The more I see this thing come together the more I don't like it. There's more tunnels, stairs, and railings that there is seating area.
How does Iowa keep fucking up every major stadium/arena project???
Yep. The revenue I’m not really concerned with, it was the humongous railings they’re putting up @gillnh2o set me straight and said they are temporary railings for the workers.Arent they putting in some higher priced luxury type seating which will make the loss of seats revenue neutral?
If that’s the case then thanks for clarifying.I believe if you zoom in on the railings you will see that they are temporary wood for safety of the construction crew.
They appear to be putting up supports for the video board.
Does it also look like those gaudy-ass railings are 7 feet tall when you compare them to the construction workers? The more I see this thing come together the more I don't like it. There's more tunnels, stairs, and railings that there is seating area.
How does Iowa keep fucking up every major stadium/arena project???
It started with CHA, hasn't gotten much better.
Yep. The revenue I’m not really concerned with, it was the humongous railings they’re putting up @gillnh2o set me straight and said they are temporary railings for the workers.
I do hate the loss of capacity though. Spending this many million dollars, why make our stadium hold less and go below 70,000. One single row extra on the top would have done it easily.
If and when the hawks get consistently good enough again to have all sellouts then there will be enough standing room only and maybe more handicapped fans in areas of the stadium to get over 70K. Just an arbitrary number if we are talking 69, 900 vs 70,001.
Michigan, OSU PSU count every living, breathing animal inside the stadium for attendance, maybe even live creature non-human mascots, but even the ushers, emergency people, concessionaires, whom ever to keep breaking their records.
I am really interested in hawks being in big games and also getting the big viewing audiences.
You know TV cant wait for the next Hawk vs Mich and Hawk vs OSU revenge games.
I've been to Michigan and Penn State; they definitely don't need to pad their numbers. Those stadiums are just plain fucking huge and full to the brim.Michigan, OSU PSU count every living, breathing animal inside the stadium for attendance, maybe even live creature non-human mascots, but even the ushers, emergency people, concessionaires, whom ever to keep breaking their records.
I'm assuming they could only go so high due to the road behind it, but there's still no excuse for falling under 70k, especially after seeing the gigantic tunnels.I've been to Michigan and Penn State; they definitely don't need to pad their numbers. Those stadiums are just plain fucking huge and full to the brim.
For people who haven't visited the big house or Beaver Stadium--even if you hate their teams, it's worth it just to see the size of them. It sounds bogus, but Beaver Stadium makes even Memorial Stadium in Lincoln look minor league.
I'm in no way saying the Hawks should go up anywhere close to 100,000 seats, but to me there's no reason our stadium should go backwards. Jesus, how much as a percentage of total cost would it be to add two rows to the top of the upper deck?
If I were Barta I'd have made that one of the main stipulations in the request for proposal.I'm assuming they could only go so high due to the road behind it, but there's still no excuse for falling under 70k, especially after seeing the gigantic tunnels.
Guys, it says here that we only have to finish 50.1% of the job by September 1, have 5 years to pass building inspections, and if we quit altogether we get paid double the amount, triple if we knock over all the port-a-pots on the way out. There's an addendum at the bottom, too, that says "Please don't whistle at Vanderberg's wife during her news stories, but if you do I promise I won't write it down or say anything." Initialed -GBYeah, but if the contractors have been paying attention to how Buyout Barta negotiates contracts...
I've been to Michigan and Penn State; they definitely don't need to pad their numbers. Those stadiums are just plain fucking huge and full to the brim.
For people who haven't visited the big house or Beaver Stadium--even if you hate their teams, it's worth it just to see the size of them. It sounds bogus, but Beaver Stadium makes even Memorial Stadium in Lincoln look minor league.
I'm in no way saying the Hawks should go up anywhere close to 100,000 seats, but to me there's no reason our stadium should go backwards. Jesus, how much as a percentage of total cost would it be to add two rows to the top of the upper deck?