JeremyUsborne
Banned
Really? Marble from freshman year to sophomore year doesn't count?
I wouldn't call it drastic, no. And don't forget that he played almost twice as much in his sophomore year. He also arguably regressed from SO to JR.
Really? Marble from freshman year to sophomore year doesn't count?
I wouldn't call it drastic, no. And don't forget that he played almost twice as much in his sophomore year.
Guys, this whole comparing ourselves to ISU thing is just plain STUPID...
It's an apples-to-oranges comparison. We'll be fielding a team that returns all five starters, they're fielding a team that returns two. Our success depends on our existing players' ability to improve, theirs depends on Hoiberg's ability to get three new guys to play well together. I'm optimistic that we'll get better, but we haven't seen drastic year-to-year improvement from any one player under Fran; I think we'll get more wins, but it may have more to do with the Big Ten taking a step back from last year.
Hoiberg's proven that he can take a new team that's never played together to the Big Dance, and he's done it twice in a row now. There's no reason to think that he can't do it again this year, but it's a totally different scenario than what we're facing, so the comparison is just dumb. We need our returning players to improve more than they improved last year, bottom line. Hopefully it happens.
Two years ago we were awful at D, last year we were good. Last year we couldn't hit a 3, this year we will be improved (that alone will lead to more wins). Combine that with natural player progression, plus adding 2 new players and this team is gonna be better once again this year (as Fran's teams have improved every year)
While Hoiberg has taken teams that haven't played together to the Dance the last 2 years, don't confuse those teams with this one. The players he rode to the Dance the previous 2 years were all legit high level D1 players (White, Christopherson, Allen, Babb, Lucious, McGee, Clyburn). That is NOT what he has coming in to his program now. He has Kane, who is legit, but the others are JUCO players who were not highly sought after, or FR.
I think ISU would be wise to take notes from the football program this year. ISU is a 50/50 shot to make the Dance this year, so they shouldn't act like they are world beaters.
Be honest, were you heaping this much praise on ISU's transfers before the last two seasons?
I doubt it. Most of us (self included) thought it was a desperate attempt at jump-starting their program after McDermott ran it into the ground. White, Allen, and Lucious were all written off as head-cases. Babb was an underutilized player from Penn State, one of the worst basketball programs in the country. People said Clyburn's numbers were due to him playing in a soft leauge (like what some are saying about Kane). Christopherson hadn't played a game for Marquette, and was ho-hum under McDermott before Hoiberg got him to flourish. And McGee was a JUCO player!
If there's one lesson I've learned about criticizing Hoiberg, it's not to question his ability to identify talent and get the most out of it. But my whole point is that's not our situation. It's an apples-to-oranges comparison.
Be honest, were you heaping this much praise on ISU's transfers before the last two seasons?
I doubt it. Most of us (self included) thought it was a desperate attempt at jump-starting their program after McDermott ran it into the ground. White, Allen, and Lucious were all written off as head-cases. Babb was an underutilized player from Penn State, one of the worst basketball programs in the country. People said Clyburn's numbers were due to him playing in a soft leauge (like what some are saying about Kane). Christopherson hadn't played a game for Marquette, and was ho-hum under McDermott before Hoiberg got him to flourish. And McGee was a JUCO player!
If there's one lesson I've learned about criticizing Hoiberg, it's not to question his ability to identify talent and get the most out of it. But my whole point is that's not our situation. It's an apples-to-oranges comparison.
Let me know when preseason rankings mean something, we were picked 8th the Big 12 the last two years and we all saw how that turned out.What is hilarious is to listen to ISU fan say that Iowa only has come good "role players": Marble 3rd team all BIG, White honorable mention all BIG....
All the while they actually think they are filled with "star players" Ejim 3rd team all Big 12 and Niang all big 12 rookie (NOT 1st team, 2nd team, 3rd team or honorable mention all Big 12).
The reality is they LOST All Big 12 performers Clyburn, Lucious, McGee, and Babb.....and Thomas, Morris and Kane AREN'T going to be replacing that kind of production that was lost. ISU fan is completely delusional this season. They actually think they are a better team than Iowa is, which every single publication is going to disagree with.
You mean as opposed to judging from the final score of the Iowa/ISU head-to-head matchup? Sure, that's sensible.
Let me know when preseason rankings mean something, we were picked 8th the Big 12 the last two years and we all saw how that turned out.
Two years ago we were awful at D, last year we were good. Last year we couldn't hit a 3, this year we will be improved (that alone will lead to more wins). Combine that with natural player progression, plus adding 2 new players and this team is gonna be better once again this year (as Fran's teams have improved every year)
While Hoiberg has taken teams that haven't played together to the Dance the last 2 years, don't confuse those teams with this one. The players he rode to the Dance the previous 2 years were all legit high level D1 players (White, Christopherson, Allen, Babb, Lucious, McGee, Clyburn). That is NOT what he has coming in to his program now. He has Kane, who is legit, but the others are JUCO players who were not highly sought after, or FR.
I think ISU would be wise to take notes from the football program this year. ISU is a 50/50 shot to make the Dance this year, so they shouldn't act like they are world beaters.
Home team won 9 of last 10, home court is huge in basketball.
Iowa, Detroit, Washington St and Texas Tech, so yeah I would say he was not highly sought after at all.
You forgot Mizzou
So a Mizzou offer means he's highly sought after?
Well in that case I would like to introduce you to our highly sought after SG recruit we just landed:
Brady Ellingson - Yahoo! Sports
I will take a 50/50 shot at the Big Dance in a rebuilding year all day, every day. Out of curiosity, what do you think Iowa's percentage is this year?
Hogue is not even in the same league as other ISU transfers. Like 33 said, Ellingson says hi with the Mizzou offer as well.
Those FR are FR, they are not kids who have all played starter minutes for D1 schools, there is a learning curve. You have a few nice recruits, but lets not confuse them with the Vaughn's or the world, or even top 50 kids. They are all like 80-125 kids.
I think ISU is much better next year than this year. Fred has pushed the time line back with all the transfer instead of going with HS recruits right away. This is the year he is starting to switch it over, and the future will be bright for them with Thomas, Morris, SDG, Custer coming in next year along with Cunningham?? and maybe a big fish in Vaughn?? I'm telling you right now, this year is the transition year, and they aren't going to be as good as many Clown fans think it will, I think it is 50/50 at best they make the NCAA.