Yea, 100,000 is hard to believe. I'm going guess somewhere around 50,000 - 60,000. Will see how close I am. I think Iowa's doing a decent job of this distancing thing and we just don't have the density of people like on the east and west coast.
If Iowa is going to be better off because we are doing a good job of social distancing, then it kinda hurts the arguement that we are overreacting. Iowa reacting responsibly is a major reason we won't be as bad off as some. The lack of population is a huge deal too. But is that going to make our numbers better per capita? Or is it just going to take us longer to get to the same number?