Northside Hawk
Well-Known Member
Economists, financial planners, family counselors, psychologists, and others have charts, graphs and curves showing the effects of tanking the economy, domestic violence, crime, murder, suicide that are more grim than the stats the corona nazis are cramming down our throats. But you will hear very little of the potential B side of all this from the media bubs.This is exactly the fine line that the experts and politicians have been straddling when making decisions and why it is not that easy. Some state that in Jan. and Feb. drastic measures should have happen like shutting down the state but when doing that there is extensive collateral damage. It's a balancing act.
Yes, I don't want people to die, but, tanking the economy affecting 97% of the population who would recover from the virus is measured against going ahead and causing economic collapse to attempt to save 3% of an elderly population with chronic health problems, many who unfortunately may have passed away in the coming months without the virus. I'm just pointing out the realistic points and what goes into the experts decisions. Where is that line at?
It's easy to state that "Damn it, they should have been more proactive and shut the state down 2 months ago", but that causes extensive collateral damage to recover from for the majority of the population. The experts hold off causing frenzy and chaos.
I'm a realistic individual who for the most part states it the way it is. I may not like it, but this is the realism of the situation in a large society and what the experts and politicians have been grappling with. Freezing the economy starts a horrible snowball effect.