Here's a hypothetical: If my aunt had a dick, would she be my uncle?
That's about how ridiculous you sound. Iowa can't beat Campbell this year, but in 3 years we could beat Duke.
You must not know what hypothetical means.
For all you idiots that are unaware, WE PLAY MORE CONFERENCE GAMES THAN WE USED TO. Which means...... we can't play as many non-conference games, make sense?? Soooo do we want to keep playing in-state for the next 20 years or keep our very limited schedule open to playing in the other 49 states?
Hypothetical: If Iowa was good enough in THREE YEARS to compete with Duke on primetime espn, would you rather play Drake?
Hey Hawkeye11en1 he is talking about when Iowa becomes good again. It really may not be that far away with the recruiting class Fran has assembled.
Even so, I would rather take my chances losing to Duke than being a puss and duck them by playing the 2nd and 3rd runs in the state that no one cares about nationally.
Why not? We are from the Big Ten and are traditionally (according to ESPN's top teams historically) we are number 10 all time in basketball. If Iowa improves it would be a good non-conference game for both teams. Even so, playing teams like Duke are much better for us than playing directional state.
Well, if your read above, I said in most years nobody watches other than the Iowa, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Texas game.
Well Iowa may not pull in the television ratings like Texas, but they sure as hell are watched more nationally (and in the state) than the other directional schools in the state of Iowa.
You see the tigerhawk and you know that is Iowa.
Big Ten NetworkSource for that first statement?
Reading the article about the series could end with these schools and what Fran has to say.....I think he is right on the money.
Come on, if the best we can come up with in continuing to play these schools because of the atmosphere was so good back in the day we can just as easily accomplish that with playing more nationally renowned schools.
Yes we are down in basketball and realistic fans will admit that. But, in the top 2 sports in the state (football and basketball) historically speaking, Iowa is the top dog in this state. All of these schools want to be Iowa....the top dog. They can never really be it, so the next best thing is to keep playing us and get some wins here and there. Unfortunately for us, the basketball team is still trying to battle out of the major funk Bowlsby, Alford, and Lickliter put us in, which has come at the benefit of the other state schools. And with Ferentz coaching, ISU has been typically getting a win once every three years, usually in Ames.
We gain nothing by playing these schools. Nothing. Absolutely nothing. They have everything to gain by beating us and we have nothing to gain by beating them.
Of course they don't want to lose us on their schedule, we keep them relevant for a few nights each sports season.
We are the traditional top dog and we need to start acting like it. I don't blame Fran one bit by trying to upgrade the schedule. Drop little brother and little cousin. Let them have it while we aspire to play teams that will get us much more exposure for our program (like Duke, Kansas, and North Carolina).
Can someone please tell me why you would have to dump the in-state schools in order to play Duke or North Carolina? You make it sound like you want to move onto bigger and better things, but I'm not hearing anything about dumping Chicago State and Brown and taking on better competition...if you want to raise Iowa's standards, get good enough to kick the other 3's a$$es again AND take on the Dukes of the world...instead using "move onto bigger and better" as a veil to hide your yellow streaks because it sucks losing rivalry games...