Here's the thing...Fran's teams tend to be egg layers. I'm not sure how else to describe it. When you think, hey this team has it going and is going to be in every game because they share the ball and have too many shooters to defend. You are absolutely convinced they will score with anyone night in and night out.
Then you go to Michigan State, embarrassing blowout...go to Purdue...embarrassing blowout...at home against Rutgers...embarrassing blowout....at Ohio State...embarrassing blowout...B10 tourney...embarrassing blowout.
This team is so inconsistent defensively...and undisciplined. To me, and I've said this before, we need a proven defensive coach on the staff. The results don't lie. Sure we are better, but I think the improvement is because we are older...not strategically or cohesively. The Michigan huddle peek in was telling...did you hear the Michigan assistant talking defensive Xs and Os? Beilein hired him three years ago to run defense only. Michigan is the most improved defensive team in the country over the past three years...look it up prior to his arrival. Fran needs to find a guy like that.
Lastly, say what you will about Kirk Ferentz...but in the B10, his teams play and are fundamentally sound. You can complain about the offensive game planning or conservatism...but the blowouts or being outclassed are few and far between. His team goes on the road and it's not going to be a shit show. Fran, well, flip a coin.
<<Sure we are better, but I think the improvement is because we are older...not strategically or cohesively.>>
This, in a nutshell, describes Iowa basketball post-Tom Davis. From Alford to McCaffery, there has never been the feeling that our program is building a consistently competitive team. Before Alford, we knew a "down" year was always possible because of timing, etc. But we also knew it was a blip on the radar, that the next season and seasons after that Iowa would be playing in the post-season.
But the landscape has also changed. "Cheating", in the broad sense, has become more rampant and brought more to the forefront. Hurrah....except..."cheating" is not only "expected" but, at blueblood programs, it's also "accepted". And it's even becoming "sport-specific". UNC's football program can lose schollies, miss bowl games, and be kept off TV. Basketball? Hell, no! By God (per NCAA), those things may not even be clear-cut violations! And, of course, some of it is "a legal issue". WTF?!
There are going to be 68 teams in the NCAA tournament and, if we were to go by "traditional" standards, a full quarter to a third of those teams should be staying home, either because of "cheating", or because they only got in because a team from a "loser" conference didn't win its conference tournament and was robbed of a bid because an 18-14 ACC or Big East or SEC team had "a better overall body of work". When a committee--any committee--can properly and clearly define what THAT is, we'll see less of the "Big East/ACC should have 11 teams!" and more, "Thank God for those scrappy kids at West Nowhere State!" from the likes of Dukie V and his ilk. ANY team that loses 15 games prior to its conference tournament should have exactly ONE way to reach the NCAA tournament: win its conference tournament.
Short of hiring a true top-level coach, Iowa basketball may NEVER get back to what it was pre-2000. And, short of winning the BTT, we will pretty much ALWAYS be going INTO the BTT wondering how far we need to advance to be a "lock".