aeischeid
Well-Known Member
HawkeyeGameFilm is pretty solid.
HawkeyeHypnosis brings the noise as well.
HawkeyeGameFilm is pretty solid.
HawkeyeGameFilm is pretty solid.Busabus,You help make my point here by implying that you or anyone else has such a profound knowledge of any sport that they have a right to deem any thread or topic "solid" as you call it. There isn't a person on here with the credentials to do that. Jon certainly has the right because it is his site, but beyond that no one here is anywhere close. So, thanks.Scorpio,Personally, assuming you were referencing my post, I am not saying people here feel bullied. I was more or less trying to liken it to something people are familiar with. Certainly people post on message boards expecting people to disagree. However, I think the childish antics of some take away from the boards because some people that could positively contribute just say screw it. I don't think people get hurt feelings or lack "stones" as you suggest. But I do think it pushes people away. In fact the original premise of this thread was that point exactly. Do you think the OP its the only person to ever stop coming to this site for those reasons? Wouldn't the more logical line of thought be that he is just the first to post about it?I'm with you on this too, bus.And people who are using the term "bully"? That is ridiculous. If you feel "bullied" because someone argues with you or pokes fun at your post on a message board, I'd say that's a "you" problem. Grow a set of stones.Disagree stronglyWhen it comes to an actual topic give me an example of this please. I think solid posts in the football/bball forums are treated fairly
HawkeyeGameFilm is pretty solid.Busabus,You help make my point here by implying that you or anyone else has such a profound knowledge of any sport that they have a right to deem any thread or topic "solid" as you call it. There isn't a person on here with the credentials to do that. Jon certainly has the right because it is his site, but beyond that no one here is anywhere close. So, thanks.Scorpio,Personally, assuming you were referencing my post, I am not saying people here feel bullied. I was more or less trying to liken it to something people are familiar with. Certainly people post on message boards expecting people to disagree. However, I think the childish antics of some take away from the boards because some people that could positively contribute just say screw it. I don't think people get hurt feelings or lack "stones" as you suggest. But I do think it pushes people away. In fact the original premise of this thread was that point exactly. Do you think the OP its the only person to ever stop coming to this site for those reasons? Wouldn't the more logical line of thought be that he is just the first to post about it?I'm with you on this too, bus.And people who are using the term "bully"? That is ridiculous. If you feel "bullied" because someone argues with you or pokes fun at your post on a message board, I'd say that's a "you" problem. Grow a set of stones.Disagree stronglyWhen it comes to an actual topic give me an example of this please. I think solid posts in the football/bball forums are treated fairly
Busabus,
You help make my point here by implying that you or anyone else has such a profound knowledge of any sport that they have a right to deem any thread or topic "solid" as you call it. There isn't a person on here with the credentials to do that. Jon certainly has the right because it is his site, but beyond that no one here is anywhere close. So, thanks.
When did I ever say that I had the ability to decide what posts were "solid"? All I said was that for the most part if you make a reasonable post it will be responded to reasonably....for the most part. That doesnt mean someone wont respond with a worthless response but I do think if you make a decent post it will be treated finely.
Its amazing how touchy some people are....its a message board
Check your 2011 award line, bud. Those aren't handed out like acid at a Phish concert.
When did I ever say that I had the ability to decide what posts were "solid"? All I said was that for the most part if you make a reasonable post it will be responded to reasonably....for the most part. That doesnt mean someone wont respond with a worthless response but I do think if you make a decent post it will be treated finely.Its amazing how touchy some people are....its a message boardBusabus,You help make my point here by implying that you or anyone else has such a profound knowledge of any sport that they have a right to deem any thread or topic "solid" as you call it. There isn't a person on here with the credentials to do that. Jon certainly has the right because it is his site, but beyond that no one here is anywhere close. So, thanks.
But the question still remains. who decides when a post is or isn't worthy, reasonable, solid or whatever? If there are in fact threads that should or can be made fun of because they deserve to be, who gets to make that distinction? That person or people is essentially making the decision and I guess I would just be curious what makes them so much more intelligent or insightful than the other person?
I don't usually post enough to care, but I see how some get frustrated....
Where's the fun in that?
Kinda like sittin in your favorite local bar. After a short while, it's not hard to identify the blowhards.
O'Keefe,
I agree with what you say there for the most part. It'd just be nice not to have to sift through all the crap to get the info. And I also don't think people should expect Jon to baby sit everyone, but people could cut back on their own a bit.
Only part id isagree with a bit is the idea that the meme things, and the like keep people from saying stupid stuff. If that were the case there would have been a lot less so called stupid things being posted a long time ago. Kind of like saying the death penalty helps prevent murder. It doesn't, but it is punitive and that's more less how I see the member type stuff. People being "punished" in a way (not really but kind of) for saying something someone thought was stupid.
i've seen several people ask why people don't just skip and not read the negative stiff I'd they don't like it. Wouldn't it be just as easy, if not easier, for people not to respond to something they deemed "stupid"?
If the blowhards are spending money and providing entertainment (content), they belong. They are in the game at least.
The guy who sits at the end of the bar, saying nothing, eating all the peanuts, and nursing a dollar draw is the problem.