So are those two players just like Dickerson?
Are both of them shot creators?
I don't know the book on both of them, so help me out?
I thought Lindsey was a 6'5" shooter and LaChance a pure PG at 6'2"...help me out.
You're right ST. Totally different players, but all can get their own shot in different ways and so stretch the D. That's what we're losing in RDM and Fran is trying to find a player that might help ease his loss next year or the year after. BTW, I think Dickerson was lower on the list because he's JC and Fran prefers 4-yrs if possible. But Dickerson is the next best thing as a 3-year player.
Here's a quote from a recent article concerning the Atwood and Dickerson offers that helped me understand the strategy:
Scout.com: McCaffery Previews PSU
"We've got some flexibility," McCaffery said. "It's not like we're in panic mode. We don't have a lot of offers out. We really have very few. Most of the guys we're offering are (high school) juniors.
"That's the thing you have to weigh. Do we really need to bring a guy in this year or can we wait? There are times when you're looking for a certain fit. If a guy fits, then we offer. It's the only way I'm able to make sense in recruiting a kid, to be able to tell him, "Look, this is a position that we need. This is a skill set that we're graduating and you can come in and help us.""
Versatile performers Roy Devyn Marble, Zach McCabe and Melsahn Basabe are seniors on this year's 16th-ranked Hawkeyes. Dickerson can play both guard spots and Atwood does the same at forward.
Some fans have wondered why McCaffery would add a point guard in his class, especially one from junior college, with Mike Gesell and Anthony Clemmons returning next season with two years of eligibility.
"Anytime you recruit somebody it's because they bring a particular skill set that's different than what you have," McCaffery said. "It's the only reason you do it. If I offer somebody, I look at them as a guard who can play or a forward who can play or just a guy who can play but can play more than one position.
"I don't pigeon hole. I think we're beyond the 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 numbering system. That's obsolete."