Search results

I want them to win at Indiana!

Easily! In six games Iowa's defense was not up to the task.

Correct! Iowa shoots the ball well enough, 62-74 shots each game, while scoring with 30+/-. If they were able to score 44%, I think they would be in the top ten. However, that is just my thinking.

It is easy to be a great BB coach when you have the best players in the nation, but it is very difficult when they are not. Iowa does not have them, nor do a great many other schools. However, according to some posters, Fran should be fired, and Iowa should hire some other bumbler. LOL.

It is easy to be a great BB coach when you have the best players in the nation, but it is very difficult when they are not. Iowa does not have them, nor do a great many other schools. However, according to some posters, Fran should be fired, and Iowa should hire some other bumbler. LOL.

Correct! He scored only 39%, while coach Hoiberg scored 51% of his shots. Give us a break!

Personally, I doubt Iowa will score 17 points. Maybe 3? They may well miss the second attempt.

The fact is: ISU allow Iowa only three points in the second half. The only thing offensive about them is their offense.

As the question is, "When did you know you were a Hawk?", I would say. 1952.

Argue? That is merely my opinion.

There can be no real question, any one of you would make a much better coach than the one we have.

Regarding the Stanzi post, I have always had trouble with A, B, and what is the name of that other letter? Regarding your post, it was my thought that the loss to CM was really bad officiating in the last 49 seconds of the game. However, losing to teams when Iowa should win occur no matter...

Gee! Thank you! But the general consensus seems to be, when any team looses, it is the coach's fault. If this is true, (It is not, ) then my facetiously written statement has merit. While coaches may sometime influence the outcome of a game, it is up to the players to win or loose. So it...

I do not think Kirk can do no wrong; being a man he makes mistakes as do all. Having observed the sixties and the seventies I hope the university does not return to those conditions. Kirk has demonstrated that he can and will win with good players. It is great players who make great coaches...

I have been convinced, there is no doubt, Kentucky must have one of the worst coaches in D1 basketball, they lost in the first round of the NIT. I know that the players and player injures had nothing to do with their loosing. Without doubt the UK should fire the coach.

I reiterate, if Iowa has receivers who do not lead the Big in dropped passes, they may well play better than .500 in conference.

It is possible that kirk will not get the program turned around, but I doubt the next ten coaches will do better, if as well.

Unless I am wrong, they did not have "the same players at OL and RB" after the MS game. Two of Iowa's OL were out for the season, resulting in a poorer pass protection and less able running game. Also, Wiseman suffered a sprained ankle and Bullock concussion. No coach can win if his players...

True, and if the receivers would catch 13 of those 17 they would be a good football team.

If the team does not lead the Big Ten in dropped passes, I think that they have a chance to finish well.