HomerChampless
Well-Known Member
Game deciding plays. Quit calling yourself names. You're better than that. At least, better head to your therapist.
So, 3 point shots and the last shot of quarters are the only plays a ref can review. Are other plays also worthy of review? Game deciding plays, maybe? I sense a rule change, here.
the clock, and game are already stopped in these instances. I really feel like this shouldn't need to be explained.
Are you siding with me or against me?
If the clock and play are stopped, what would hurt the review of a game changing play?
If you are for review under game changing instances because the game and clock are stopped, good for you.
Game deciding plays. Quit calling yourself names. You're better than that. At least, better head to your therapist.
Let me just clarify, you're saying that the refs should be allowed to review plays such as the last play in game 2?
Ah, yeassssssss, such as the Lebron reach in foul of Durant.
Guys stop! The refs are doing their best and thats all that matters!
Guys stop! The refs are doing their best and thats all that matters!
BTW. I think on Sundays there should be a team of ref's that go back and look at all of the plays in college football the previous day to see if there was any holding and those penalties should be assessed.
Travism, I know you hate my gay marriage opinon. I wish you'd get a life. Move on.
You're boring.
I think posters who think they have the winning argument based on their dopey pictures are pathetic.
EDIT: again, what are the reasons for any review?