He's pretty scrappy, gritty and gutty.Upside is code for black. I think we can all agree Jordan has a high motor.
He's pretty scrappy, gritty and gutty.Upside is code for black. I think we can all agree Jordan has a high motor.
What is his upside? He's always going to be small and not athletic at his position. He's already a good 3 point shooter but I don't see him ever being able to penetrate and score. I don't think he'll ever be a good defender. Do you think he's going to be able to shoot 60% from 3 or where do you see this upside at?
scored 23 pts, had 7- 3 pointers and 7 assists in first career start at Notre Dame... sounds like a kid who's peaked
scored 0 points on 0-8 shooting against Michigan State...
If JBo doesn't improve at anything and just duplicates what he did as a freshman for 3 more years he'll have some pretty crazy stats all time at Iowa I bet... I bet he'd be #1 in assists and 3pters made among other things. I'm saying this without even doing the math but I also say this knowing he'll be improving on them. What's the over under for what he'll avg in assists this yr? I'll stick my neck out and say 5 (with 3 being unimpressive). I bet he'll avg more than the 11 pts he did too considering the first 8 games or so he didn't start or play as much. That slow start really skewed his overall stats. If you were to look at just his last 15 games or so.... He was awesome. Not just ok.. I see no reason to think he couldn't improve some on his play and stats. Just because he isn't Allen Iverson and able to get in the lane and to the rim or free throw line a ton doesn't mean he's good player. John Stockton, Mark Price, Heck BJ Armstrong himself wasn't even that type of player you seem to envision as being your perfect PG. Don't get me wrong if another Penny Hardaway comes along I hope we can get him. But I'm not going to complain about JBo. He's earned more than he's received as far as adoration from some of his 'fans' goes...What is his upside? He's always going to be small and not athletic at his position. He's already a good 3 point shooter but I don't see him ever being able to penetrate and score. I don't think he'll ever be a good defender. Do you think he's going to be able to shoot 60% from 3 or where do you see this upside at?
The kid can't have a bad game? That's pretty short sided in the world of sports.
If JBo doesn't improve at anything and just duplicates what he did as a freshman for 3 more years he'll have some pretty crazy stats all time at Iowa I bet... I bet he'd be #1 in assists and 3pters made among other things. I'm saying this without even doing the math but I also say this knowing he'll be improving on them. What's the over under for what he'll avg in assists this yr? I'll stick my neck out and say 5 (with 3 being unimpressive). I bet he'll avg more than the 11 pts he did too considering the first 8 games or so he didn't start or play as much. That slow start really skewed his overall stats. If you were to look at just his last 15 games or so.... He was awesome. Not just ok.. I see no reason to think he couldn't improve some on his play and stats. Just because he isn't Allen Iverson and able to get in the lane and to the rim or free throw line a ton doesn't mean he's good player. John Stockton, Mark Price, Heck BJ Armstrong himself wasn't even that type of player you seem to envision as being your perfect PG. Don't get me wrong if another Penny Hardaway comes along I hope we can get him. But I'm not going to complain about JBo. He's earned more than he's received as far as adoration from some of his 'fans' goes...
You pointed out a good game so I pointed out a bad game. That's how sports work.
bingo - an assist is an assist, a basket going through the hoop is either 1,2 or 3 pts no matter how it's achieved or how you see it. Great players find a way to impact the game in any way they can - conventionally or not - just because of where he ranked in HS doesn't pre-determine Jordan's career at Iowa like 56 tries to sell daily
I pointed out his first start ever, but yeah, all calibers of players have good and bad games
You pointed out a good game so I pointed out a bad game. That's how sports work.
If you hate Iowa so much, why don't you follow a different team?You pointed out a good game so I pointed out a bad game. That's how sports work.
If you hate Iowa so much, why don't you follow a different team?
I just don't agree with "an assist is an assist". Would you rather have a guy who could get a dunk any time he wanted or a guy who could get a mid range jumper any time he wanted? The mid range jumper is nowhere near as reliable as a dunk. Its the same way with assists. If your passes are at the mercy of whether or not your teammate makes a jumper, it's not near as beneficial to the team as if your pass gets your teammate a better scoring opportunity like a layup or dunk.
It doesn't matter what side you're on, you think the other side has alternative facts. People are funny how they think they know what's true and what's not. Seth Davis is the worst how sure he is that has on the "right side" like he sits in white house meetings or something.
If you hate Iowa so much, why don't you follow a different team?