Cyclones17
Well-Known Member
See, I read the lack of penetrators on Iowa's team as evidence of how well Cartwright played, not as an explanation for his high assist numbers. Not only did Cartwright have to play a ton of minutes in the second half of the season, but the entire offense had to run through him for Iowa to do anything at all. He wasn't great from the line, but at least he got there (75 FT attempts on the year, which was #4 on the team). I realize the 3.3 TOs doesn't look great, but the guy was our only ball handler for long stretches of play. How many sets boiled down to Bryce being forced to make something out of nothing? Does he have those problems if he plays at Ohio State? I say no way.
I just keep coming back to the 44% team field goal shooting percentage. If Iowa can bump it up even to 47% next year, what kind of numbers does BC put up? You might say he put up inflated numbers on an 11-win team, but without him, how many would we have won? Six? Maybe?
I could care less about who offered who and when. Put a competing scholarship offer in one hand and take a dump in the other and see which fills up first.
You are right, without Bryce Cartwright Iowa wins 7 games.
BUT, without Moore, Purdue wins 18 games. Without Lucas Michigan State wins 13 games. I think you can take out a player from every team in the country and that team is going to lose more games.
Cartwright was very important to Iowa this year and they needed his ability to get in the lane. I just strongly believe that he is an average PG in the Big 10 and Iowa can find better talent down the road.