dahlhawk
Well-Known Member
Sorry two NIU fans told me he was a freshman. Thought they would know their own team. I'm not pessimistic about this team's chances of being good and winning games, I'm just disappointed the offense wasn't sharper. We would not have beaten NW, Iowa State, or Purdue on this day in my opinion, but we were good enough to beat NIU so that's the important take away I guess. On the INT the QB had min. pressure, time to go through his progressions, then just decided to pass it to a covered receiver. Up to that point he was playing a very good game but that one looked "unforced" to me, more like a brainfart.The NIU QB is a sophomore, and was the MAC offensive freshman of the year last year.
The int wasn't unforced, Iowa had some pressure from a blitz (Hockaday did not get home, but he clogged a passing lane and caused the QB to scramble). The QB thought he had something, but Hooker had great coverage.
NIU's first FG was a chip shot. But if you are going to take away their miss, can we also take away the blocked punt that led to it?
NIU's second FG was 50 yards into the wind.
Not only did we beat a MAC team at home, we covered the spread by +16. Many 2nd stringers got in and got experience. We played 7 OL with the first unit, and they all seemed solid. We are legit 9 deep next week when our OT return. There are probably as many Fr and So in the 2-deep as there have ever been under KF. You can take a pessimistic view if you want, but things look a lot sunnier from where I am sitting.
Last edited: