Long time reader of hawkeye nation ... first time poster.
Found out from family member (who is close friends with someone very close to situation) tonight that Anthony Tucker was granted his release from the university of Iowa.
... so in other words he will not be seeing the floor anytime soon.
I've several serious problems with this (as of now) rumor.
First, it is posted hours after Tucker dressed for the NW game, only a few days after he accompanied the team to Ohio State. To say the least, this indicates an extremely short time period for Tucker to have made his request, gotten an audience, someone to leak the story, then have it get to someone to post on the internet.
Secondly, it makes no sense...unless Tucker is withdrawing immediately from school, giving up this semester's work, abandoning a full college scholarship now to go home---to do what?
Particularly, the phrase asking to be "released" from his scholarship is nonsensical. Athletic schollies, by NCAA rules) are for each academic year. One Year only. Renewable at the discretion of the school granting the schollie. If Tucker wants to leave, he has no reason to "request that he be released". All he has to do is pack up & go. Doesn't need permission to do that. The difference is if he stays in school, whether he plays or not, he has a full schollie for this academic year--and, maybe, some prospect of Lickliter offering to renew if for another year...or even two years. What is totally implausible is that he plans to finish the semester & get the college credits for his work this term but nonetheless is asking the university to stop giving him free room, board, tuition, travel expense, etc from now until the semester ends.
This rumor seems to be rooted in a confusion growing out of two misunderstandings": (1) first, of the NCAA distinction between INITIAL and CONTINUING eligibility, and the procedure for a student-athlete to get out of a signed letter-of-intent without having to wait a year to be eligible; and (2) the rules of the BT, NCAA, and specific schools with regard to future continuing eligibility when transferring from one school to another.
(it can be the difference between sitting out two years, one year or being eligible the next academic year, depending upon whether the administrators/coaches support the appeal by the transferring student-athlete for a waiver or exception to NCAA/conference eligibility rules).
From what has been published about Tucker's situation his opetions would seem to be only two: stay at Iowa, get re-instated in good standing, get his schollie renewed, play the full season for the Hawkeyes next year, lose no eligibility (beyond the 2nd semester of his freshman year when he was academically ineligible; either stay through this semester at Iowa or go home now, then seek to transfer elsewhere in August for the 2010-2011 academic year, and become eligible for the second semester, with a year & a half of total eligibility (unless he plays yet this semester at Iowa, which would reduce it to a single year).
Given his citizenship & academic difficulties while at Iowa, it probably could not matter whether he leaves with Lickliter's blessing or not (Tucker is not likely to stay in the BT where he cannot get a schollie elsewhere).
For his sake, I hope he is not as foolish as he would have to be to give substance to the rumor. But, then, no telling considering the weak grasp on reality of many young athletes...