I dont disagreee that Tiger may be the best golfer that ever lived. Nicklaus never worked on his short game on into the green as his iron accuracy was great and he was a great putter. But I really disagree with this statement about the playing fields that Tiger has destroyed. Arnold had to play against Hogan and Nicklaus and Trevino and these three players were way better than most of today's worldwide golfers. Nicklaus was competing with many more players who won 3 majors in their careers, such as , Palmer, Player, Trevino, Watson, Faldo, Seve, etc. Man, if you think Tiger has played against stronger fields in the majors you dont know golf. Tiger may have played against deeper fields from #2 to #150 in the field but definitely not the level of golfers who showed they could win majors time in and time out. I am waiting to see how tiger attacks augusta with his new high fade as the course really sets up for draws from a right hander.Best golfer that's ever lived. I love Jack and Arnie and Seve, etc. But none of them had the fields that Tiger destroyed.
the reason people haven't showed they can win majors time in and time out is because of how deep the fields are. its easier to win majors when there are only a hand full of people good enough to challenge you. if Jack played 4 "good" rounds of golf there were only a few people that could beat him by playing great. now days there are 50 to 100 guys who are capable of putting 4 great rounds of golf together and beating tiger when he's not on his best game.
a few years ago tiger got 2nd in I think 3 majors in a row. he played pretty good in those but each time there was 1 player who put it all together for 1 great week and beat him.