ColoradoHAWKEYE
Well-Known Member
[/QUOTE]Cool. Golf's a great game.No doubt Tiger brought an expansion to the game. Question is whether it's sustainablePost
or not. Lotta courses closing the doors these days.[/QUOTE]
I think this has much more to do with the economy and cost of golf, than with emanating pro golfers.
Most of your arguments Kansas are weak.
Tiger's legacy on golf and giving back is far from over, and as those great golfers before him, their's didn't even begin until their competitive playing days were complete. A mentioned, Tiger has already several areas where hes given back.
Tigers "return" to golf, and now winning, is more important to the game being viewed than any other single golfer at this time. Ask any of the tournament directors or networks.
or not. Lotta courses closing the doors these days.[/QUOTE]
I think this has much more to do with the economy and cost of golf, than with emanating pro golfers.
Most of your arguments Kansas are weak.
Tiger's legacy on golf and giving back is far from over, and as those great golfers before him, their's didn't even begin until their competitive playing days were complete. A mentioned, Tiger has already several areas where hes given back.
Tigers "return" to golf, and now winning, is more important to the game being viewed than any other single golfer at this time. Ask any of the tournament directors or networks.