We always hear on the news when talking about an individual reported to be on the sexual registry, that they are a low risk, medium risk or high risk to re-offend. Do you have anything to add or touch on the vetting that goes on to determine the risk level for these individuals? Is it all by interviewing the individual, well along with history for some?
When I was in my mid 20s I got busted for peeing outside a bar in an alley at 2 in the morning. If I ever get busted again, I guarantee I'll be low risk to ever sexually assault a little kid, even tho I will be on the same list as them. What a joke to put someone on a list like that that has no business being on it. That list should be reserved for terrible people. Sorry for the rant but that bugs me. My wife sent me a picture of a map of sexual offenders that live in my neighborhood just the other day. I seriously responded "we don't know if they assaulted a kid or peed in public". That question shouldn't have to be asked.