I never said he could finish at the rim, I said he could get to the rim and effectively penetrate. He had over 200 assists last year so he could effectively penetrate and kick. Mike's mid range game was pretty salty too. He was really good at driving and pulling up but never developed that floater he needed to be effective at the rim
You are talking about Mike as a Sr. compared to Jordan 7 games into his college career.
Mike didn't have 200 assist as a Fr, he had 89 assists as a Fr., and averaged 2.6 APG. Jordan will easily beat that as he already has 32 assists for 4.6 APG. Mike didn't average 4.0 assist per game until he was a Jr., and I'm thinking Jordan will probably do that or better as a Fr.
Jordan is 7 games into his career, lets see what he does the rest of the year, and then I'm betting Jordan gets better over the years.
Mike was kind of the exception in that he basically didn't improve from his Fr. year PER of 14.6 to a career PER of 14.5. He just kind of flat lined. He never figured out how to get his own shot off, he never could penetrate and create offense for himself or others, and he never finished at the rim at all.
I really bought into Mike after his Fr. year, and I still think he was a good PG. Yet looking at your criteria Mike certainly wasn't a PG, and if you think he could create his own shot, finish at the rim, and effectively penetrate, I disagree with that assessment of Mike.
I never said he could finish at the rim, I said he could get to the rim and effectively penetrate. He had over 200 assists last year so he could effectively penetrate and kick. Mike's mid range game was pretty salty too. He was really good at driving and pulling up but never developed that floater he needed to be effective at the rim
Were you saying all this about Mike last year or are you just talking him up now as a way of ripping on current players? You saying Mike could penetrate and dish makes me question if you even watched games.
Mike would drive and kick out to wings all the time. He had over 200 assists last year. I'd love to know how Mike averaged over 8 ppg last year too considering everyone on here saying he couldn't shoot the 3 ball and couldn't create his own offense. Must have been a statistical error
No he absolutely would not. If he had 200 assists, I bet 150 were to jump shooters coming off screens and 40 were in transition. I doubt I said "good pass" after a Gesell assist 10 times last year. I honestly don't know if I said it 5 times. I said it twice last night for JB. Gesell never sucked in the defense and hit an open man and he never made a tough post pass. My use of the word never is almost as literal as you can get.
MG and Sapp weren't good shooters, didn't like to shoot, and other teams identified this constantly.
I disagree
Our entire offense was Uthoff and Jok shooting jumpers off screens. We had no post game at all. How many times did you yell "throw him the ball" because a post would have perfect position and Mike would just pass it around the 3 pt line ignoring him?
He holds the single season assist record for us. I think he was elite when it came to passing and running the offense.
If teams guarded JB like they guarded Mike last year, he would shoot a 3 every single time down the floor. I watched a game last year from 2nd row center court and was shocked how much they sagged off him. Until then, when people talked about it, I thought they were being dramatic because TV doesn't even come close to showing how bad it really was.
I can't imagine what we would look like with JB, Jok, and Uthoff on the floor at the same time. That's not even to say he's the better player of the two. Just that he would make that particular team better.
Gesell didn't create much...and didn't like shooting...not tough to defend
He holds the record for most assists in a season. He created a lot of our offense
You're so funny with stats. Him holding the record doesn't necessarily mean he created a lot of offense. I've already posted how he got hid assists. If you don't agree that's fine. But just throwing out a stat over and over like it proves your point is weak.
You're so funny with stats. Him holding the record doesn't necessarily mean he created a lot of offense. I've already posted how he got hid assists. If you don't agree that's fine. But just throwing out a stat over and over like it proves your point is weak.