lightning1
Well-Known Member
.....should have given Lickliter more time.
Some of his stuff is in the same boat of what Schwartz wrote. Btw, I think people are being overly critical. I understand what Schwartz was trying to get at.
Me too. Quote from the article:
Michigan sits two wins from a national championship. With 2:20 to play in overtime, they trailed Iowa. It means something, although it’s hard to figure out what.
Actually it's almost meaningless in a macro sense, and that's what everyone is criticizing.
That stuff happens too though. I don't think that's anything to get bent out of shape about. You beat who is in front of you.
ISU played KU pretty dang well too. They crushed Tech and WVU who made the Elite 8 and Sweet 16 respectively. Then they promptly went on a tremendous losing streak to end the year.
In 2015 #4 Wisconsin lost to Rutgers at home. Stuff like this happens all the time. It's basketball. I mean people are properly mocking this article but in an era of hot takes this is just ridiculous.
IMO this is Michigan every game. When they hit the 3 they are tough. When they don't the game goes down to the wire.Iowa was only in that game because Michigan's 2 best players were in constant foul trouble and Michigan shot like 0 for 13 from 3 point land to start. Michigan handed Iowa that game and Iowa still couldn't take it.
Good post. Youre spot on imoFact. Michigan is in the Final 4. Is Michigan one of the top 4 teams in the country? Are they one of the top 10 teams in the country? I don't think they are but that's just my opinion. I think West Virginia and multiple other teams are in the Final 4 playing the teams below...allowing for 1 almost certain loss that becomes a win (like Michigan's on 2 missed FTs and a miracle shot).
14 - Montana
6 - Houston
7 - Texas A&M
9 - Florida State
So the only team Michigan played that is higher than a 7 seed had them beat and let it get away. Now they get an 11 seed in the Final 4. And I suspect many would agree the team they play next is the best team they have played thus far in the tournament.
Edit - The point I am trying to make is we almost beat a team in the Final 4. But Michigan is not one of the top 4 teams in the country IMO.
Each team has a wide range of performance it will perform each game, depending on various factors. Michigan's was at their poorer range when they played Iowa, Iowa's was towards its higher level. Thus the close game. It's not rocket science.
I don't even think Iowa played all that good, even for their standards. They gave up a bunch of wide open layups and wide open 3 attempts on defense, then they didn't shoot all that great on offense. I would say we played average and Michigan shot poorly from 3.
Me too. Quote from the article:
Michigan sits two wins from a national championship. With 2:20 to play in overtime, they trailed Iowa. It means something, although it’s hard to figure out what.
Actually it's almost meaningless in a macro sense, and that's what everyone is criticizing.
The one thing I took from the Michigan game was how we were kinda unlucky with how much every other team this year lit us up from 3. Michigan is a good team that had wide open shots all night and kept missing them. Games like that normally happen all the time in college. It happened one tike against Iowa. I know people love to say "if a college player is open, they're going to make it". But that just isn't true. We played terrible defense and deserved what we got. But it was still ridiculous that it took until the very last game of the year for a team to miss.