Is it true that when Iowa plays a week form Saturday, they line up 4 rb's in the backfield and no qb?
Actually, we're playing 7 OL 2 RB and 2 TEs. They call it the Barge formation like Wisconsin was running last year.
Is it true that when Iowa plays a week form Saturday, they line up 4 rb's in the backfield and no qb?
Notice how player B has the most YPA. Anyway, those are fun but you can always find statistical anomalies. Also, it doesn't mean he had a good year every year. Joe Namath played a lot of years with bad knees I think. Stats tell a story and I bet they tell his story year by year. With that many INTs though I don't think he'd make KF's team, jk, I think.
Mother of God. Namath threw more interceptions than touchdowns in 11 of his 13 seasons. He was good for his day, but he's dogshit if you look at him compared to the decades of quarterbacks who have followed him. His stats make Mark Sanchez look good, for God's sake. Does that tell the story of Joe Namath?
I guess his good years were good enough to get him in the Hall of Fame. Whatya think smart guy?
Ok, but how the heck do we know that any of the 3 play "too safe". GD is even saying he is coaching them to take shots when they are available.
I don't know about anyone else but I have no idea yet that's why I'm not saying much about the qb race. I think people are worried that since Kirk has a history of going with the safe pick, he might go with the safe pick this time even if its not the best pick. I do know this, if the starter plays like jvb last year and no one else gets a chance, I will be on here complaining.
fine.
bit I wana know how to pronounce it
le SHUN
LE shun
?
I just can't read anything with his name on it because it is a speed bump. And for a speed reader for me a speed bump can put in spinning into a new dimention.
I heard a week form tomorrow they're actually gonna play football Meatman. Must be a rumor.
I guess his good years were good enough to get him in the Hall of Fame. Whatya think smart guy?
Be careful, the board police might be after you for a comment like that.
can't be. people on here aren't agitated enough for that to be the case.
Like I wrote he got in because he called his shot and it has been immortalized...not because of stats. Stats don't tell the whole story.
I know, I read what your wrote. You might be right about that. I'm no expert on Joe Namath and I haven't looked at his stats. I assumed he must have had at least a good year or two. I wrote stats usually tell a story (not the "whole" story). I'm sure you can find some rare occurences. Stats, especially combined with other input such as your eyesite, are usually a pretty good indicator of what's going on.
Take a gander. I wasn't being facetious when I said he makes Sanchez looks good.
Joe Namath NFL & AFL Football Statistics - Pro-Football-Reference.com
Well, one thing I notice is that 3 out of only 4 years he had a winning record he had over 8.0 ypa and the other winning year (out of 4) he had 7.6 ypa.