Your whole argument about CJ is flawed, 56. Your reasoning about CJ is that Kentucky basketball is down and so that means he's not that good, despite the stats, testimonials from his coach and other coaches, and the awards he's won. You use the fact that the top recruit in KY is #222 while Iowa has two top 75 recruits. All that proves is that Iowa has two guys higher rated than what Kentucky has. That doesn't prove that Iowa basketball is better top to bottom than Kentucky's. It also doesn't speak to the competition CJ went up against each and every game as compared to, say, Wieskamp went up against. If recruiting rankings went as high as 1,000 or 1,500 I'd make the supposition that Kentucky would have more in that pool than Iowa would have, based on the 1.3 million advantage in population. It's not provable but makes sense to assert with logic that CJ's competition was actually slightly tougher than JW's.