SwirlinLingerie
Well-Known Member
Man, rough...
The other side would be don't be surprised if we see no change at all. I'd think this would be the game to get Padilla in and see what he can do. If he shows a pulse against a mediocre team then why not make the switch. That said there's really no such thing as a mediocre opponent when we're scoring an astonishing 7 points a game in OOC play with both games at home.I figured he would, at least to see how he does with Ragaini and possibly Johnson back. But, I bet you he has a short leash and the plan will be to pull him if he doesn't perform better. How can it not be.
So, I'm not surprised at all they will start with him to give him one last chance against a shitty team. But, don't be surprised if we don't see a backup if the O is still a bit stagnant.
The other side would be don't be surprised if we see no change at all. I'd think this would be the game to get Padilla in and see what he can do. If he shows a pulse against a mediocre team then why not make the switch. That said there's really no such thing as a mediocre opponent when we're scoring an astonishing 7 points a game in OOC play with both games at home.
I totally agree, but I'm also looking at current body of work and inability to make any changes whatsoever. I've always been optimistic, or at least tried to be, but things aren't looking good.I think that would be a death sentence for Ferentz's at this point. Third game in and no production against a crappy ass team? If no change would be made, can you imagine the fallout that would happen among fans and media. There is no way they want to deal with answering that.
KF utilizing his version of scorched earth policyI think that would be a death sentence for Ferentz's at this point. Third game in and no production against a crappy ass team? If no change would be made, can you imagine the fallout that would happen among fans and media. There is no way they want to deal with answering that.
You can disagree, but I can guarantee I knew before you did. End of story. (Is that how you do it? )We all knew he would.
Actually you didn't because the guy in the office next to mine pays for Liestikow's texts like you and sends them to me.You can disagree, but I can guarantee I knew before you did. End of story. (Is that how you do it? )
Also, isn't one of the gentleman's rules to be on his list that you're not supposed to share the information?You can disagree, but I can guarantee I knew before you did. End of story. (Is that how you do it? )
My issue with Leistikow is that he's Jekyll and Hyde depending on whether he's in front of either Kirk or Brian, and to a much greater degree than other guys like Dochterman, Hlas, Kennington Smith, Morehouse & Emmert back when they were beat reporters.I don't pay for it. I waited until he tweeted anyway. I know you thought he was a little giggly in his Bri podcast interview, but I think you have to consider the format of that. He's given crazy access and time with the OC to go in-depth on the thought process behind Iowa's offensive scheme. I don't see him holding back as a columnist. I think most consider him critical yet fair.
I’m fine with getting beat 3-2 by a horrible Nevada team. Dead serious.We really need to hope for a 3-0 win this week. The last thing we need is to win 20-3 and have Petras throw for 175 yards against a bad team. That will be just enough to give him a couple more games. Then the season is half over and what's the point of making a change.