Hawkeye/swish
Well-Known Member
If Padilla or Labas any one of them do not see the field next game , enter the transfer portal the next dayIf I'm Padilla or Labas......I'm pretty disheartened.
If Padilla or Labas any one of them do not see the field next game , enter the transfer portal the next dayIf I'm Padilla or Labas......I'm pretty disheartened.
Booing is what we needI normally wouldn't go this far, but I'm 100% in agreement with Fry here. If KF is gonna be so stubborn and blinded by Petras "resume", then keep Petras in the entire game and I hope they lose. I'll be there and I promise to not 'boo' if they do. Of course, a more likely loss scenario would be Petras starting & playing 3 quarters, Padilla inserted for the 4th quarter and playing average but Iowa still losing, then afterward KF saying "I told you changing QBs wouldn't solve everything!"
This is BS to a point. I don't think u have followed KF over the entire time at Iowa and only want to look past a few yrs. He's done changes. But,bi admit he struggles with it and is not quick to pull the trigger as fast as he should. It's not his strong pointYour assuming that their is some sort of fair and open competition and Kirk has a burning desire to win at all cost. Big assumptions.
If you've been following Kirk for his career there is no chance anyone but Petras starts, plus no other QB will get ANY significant playing time let alone pass the ball. If, Iowa has a lead Petras will play all the way or until the 2 or 3 minute mop time. Iowa will run the ball. Kirk went into this season after last season determined there will be NO QB controversy. Honestly, if Iowa does make a change forget about Padilla, I want to start over with Joey or May.
It really was absurd.That was a fucking hilarious answer. "Yep, those are some good points. Can't argue with those stats. We are still going with Petras."
Stanzi became the starter after the Pitt "gut feeling" game. It was either the 3rd or 4th game.You all have pretty short memories... after starting his entire sophomore season it took 7 bad games from Jake Christensen in his junior year before Ricky Stanzi became the starter. Why would anyone think it will happen in less time now?
Stanzi became the starter after the Pitt "gut feeling" game. It was either the 3rd or 4th game.
That's one of the things I am worried about, too. Even if Brian no longer wants to start Petras, what do the other coaches think of him and his influence within the program?What gets me isn't that Petras still sucks. Or that the Oline minus Linderbaum would be bad. It's the bull headed stubbornness of KF. We'd gotten a little taste of 'New Kirk' that'd started a few yrs ago with him being more aggressive and doing some not so conservative things. He said that this isn't some kind of intentional derailment. Then what would one call it?
There's no way that the coaching staff is all on the same page with how KF has handled any of this. And to me that's what could be tough to over come going forward. The kids will get in line and follow orders. The other coaches though have careers to think about.
Now a guy like Woods is probably one foot out the door for another job anyway he's going to be highly coveted and he's as high as he can go at Iowa till KF is gone. I would think after this yr he'll be taking either a coordinator job someplace or even a HC job at a MAC level. But staying here another yr after this fiasco doesn't seem like the best thing for his career.
Guys like Betts and Hodge have to be wondering what the heck have they gotten themselves into. I'd love to be a fly on the wall in the coaches meetings to know who all thinks what. Do those guys have the balls to even share their true 2 cents or are they yes men just glad to be there? Heck if I know but this is just getting into some serious Loony Tunes level nuts.
I think what gets people is that from the outside, this seems completely inexplicable.
And KF doesn't do anything to clearly explain the decision. He throws out a bunch of generalities about "body of work" and looking at the "whole picture", and these just don't hold up to any level of scrutiny. Media are not allowed to observe any practices, we are just told to trust that the coaches know a bunch of stuff we don't, and that makes the decisions the right ones.
I understand these coaches know a lot more than us and have a lot more experience and knowledge than us. But when you make a decision that is completely inexplicable, you don't do anything to clarify that decision, you lack any semblance of transparency, and your results are the worst in the country, the outside is going to stop trusting that you actually know what you're doing.
I think I will take Saturday off. Spencer and the O together make for a very bad combo. I think I've seen enough of that show for a full year. If Nevada sucks badly Petras might have an average day, which is all he needs to keep starting, which is horrible for this team's chances this year. Ferentz's + Petras = Lost season
When push comes to shove his priorities in order are:
1) Protecting his own ass
2) Protecting his kid
My thoughts as well, and I think a major (main?) reason he's sticking w/ Petras.
If he sticks w/ Petras and the offense stinks, he gets fan / media angst for being stubborn (or clueless, or whatever). "Oh well"
But, if he replaces SP and the offense still stinks? Now all the attention shifts to BF, and himself. Derails BF's chances to inherit the throne. "Can't happen"
He was actually within a foot or two most of the time ...Spence was very close on quite a few passes
He was actually within a foot or two most of the time
If he would take a little mustard off the ball every now and then, perhaps we could expect, once in a while, an actual completion
The crowd screaming throughout the course of the game actually add to his confidence
It's All Good, Lads
It's almost looking like he has the longest leash in the country. 12 straight wins worth of credit...I figured he would, at least to see how he does with Ragaini and possibly Johnson back. But, I bet you he has a short leash and the plan will be to pull him if he doesn't perform better. How can it not be.
So, I'm not surprised at all they will start with him to give him one last chance against a shitty team. But, don't be surprised if we don't see a backup if the O is still a bit stagnant.
I agree that we need to lose for change against the non conference but the last thing we need is to win the West. Probably the weakest it's ever been and a 3 loss conference team will probably be crowned. Winning the West this year proves nothing. We'll be in route for a 30 point routing in the championship game and Kirk will get to continue his ways.I’m fine with getting beat 3-2 by a horrible Nevada team. Dead serious.
It would be the only thing that could possibly make a change happen. We would still be 0-0 in the division and have the same chance as anyone else going forward.
I agree that we need to lose for change against the non conference but the last thing we need is to win the West. Probably the weakest it's ever been and a 3 loss conference team will probably be crowned. Winning the West this year proves nothing. We'll be in route for a 30 point routing in the championship game and Kirk will get to continue his ways.