DJI9424
Well-Known Member
I think the irony of this situation is quite rich. KF preaches execution and preparation all the time to his team, yet given that he hired his son as OC, was he prepared for the possibility of BF needing to be disciplined and how he could do that without showing signs of favoritism? Moreover, looking at it from BF's perspective, would he have acted the same way if the Head Coach was not his dad?
KF placed himself in a "no win" (even worse than play not to lose) position by selecting his son as OC. No matter what he does, he will be second-guessed for either doing too little or too much; the idea that he gets it right is almost nil.
I know KF does not wish to make himself or his coaching staff the center of attention but the very act of placing his son in the position of OC made that possibility a virtual certainty. That's poor execution, and if anyone should realize that at this juncture, it is KF. We'll see how well he manages his way through this unfortunate incident. If he handles it poorly, whatever plans he held for his son's future with the U of I may go up in smoke.
KF placed himself in a "no win" (even worse than play not to lose) position by selecting his son as OC. No matter what he does, he will be second-guessed for either doing too little or too much; the idea that he gets it right is almost nil.
I know KF does not wish to make himself or his coaching staff the center of attention but the very act of placing his son in the position of OC made that possibility a virtual certainty. That's poor execution, and if anyone should realize that at this juncture, it is KF. We'll see how well he manages his way through this unfortunate incident. If he handles it poorly, whatever plans he held for his son's future with the U of I may go up in smoke.