tksirius
HN's Love Doctor
How will a jury view this?
How will a jury view this?
Word is that Meyer recently applied for an athletic AD sports position within Rutgers. Those at Rutgers who interviewed her asked for some references from the athletic dept at Iowa, she couldn't get one person to give her one. So, Meyer did not get hired at Rutgers. Just shows how despised she was by others at Iowa.
This is the perfect distraction and sets Iowa up for another infamous KF under the radar run, brilliant!I am worried that this case will drag on and cast a shadow on our National Championship run this fall.
Might want to check your facts. The Register reported that Griesbaum did not report to Meyer, During the University's investigation into the Field Hockey program, they asked Meyer if she had a relationship with Griesbaum. This is against the U of I's own policy and is part of the discrimination lawsuit.None of those arguments would have any merit should her lawyer bring them up.
Hiring relatives is extremely common in college sports, as long as the relationship stays professional, and in Brian's case, it's hard to say it hasn't been. Same with the Brands.
Language on a field or court of play is rough and cannot be expected to be clean, and again has no bearing on job performance.
Meyer's problem with Griesbaum is that she knowingly entered a relationship with someone who directly reports to her, which is very unprofessional, regardless of sexual orientation or gender. On top of that, it's been reported that because of this, Meyer may have given Griesbaum's team special consideration and resources compared to other athletic teams.
I really do not see Iowa losing this case. So far, Meyer has relied mostly on character assassination of the athletic department, which, to me, reeks of a lack of evidence on her claims.
Let's just hope the 12 jurors aren't all Cyclone fans
Jon or Rob, did you ever have any issues with Meyer?
I'm going to go out on a limb here Rob, and say that nothing happened in that car ride as far as sexual tension or innuendo.I did not but I also didn't have much interaction with her.
She gave me a ride from the airport to my off-site rental car place once during a road game. She seemed nice. That was more than 15 years ago. As I said, I didn't have much interaction with her since then.
I'm going to go out on a limb here Rob, and say that nothing happened in that car ride as far as sexual tension or innuendo.
This is the perfect distraction and sets Iowa up for another infamous KF under the radar run, brilliant!
This lady(is she the guy in the relationship?) is throwing stones all over the place, ballsy move and career suicide.
Interested to hear how Barta is on the stand. Who'd want to go to one of his parties anyway? Lame as F and a bunch of rich pricks you'd rather not be around anyhow if you ask me.
I get what you're saying Bob, but the phrase "rich pricks" didn't come out of thin air the first time it was uttered.Class envy looks good on nobody.
She's got nothing to lose and is taking the only Hail Mary she possibly has left.Seems like a high-risk play by Meyer. She has to realize that the trial transcript (or at least the key points) are going to be stapled to the back of her resume for any significant job she applies for.