Bevins and Hill were fallback recruits for Iowa. The top recruits in Iowa never give ISU serious consideration.
ISU is not beating Iowa on in state recruiting. But I have to say, if they do get more instate kids (because they have to, because they can't recruit good out of state players, whatever) maybe they will have an advantage in the rivalry game each year. If they have a roster full of guys that want to win the game, players that care about the rivalry, homegrown kids, then they could beat Iowa. Assuming that Iowa has out of state kids that have never heard of ISU. It's a problem, and I think it is the cause of Iowa's struggles with beating ISU.
Irrelevant. Not sure anything prior to 2012 makes much difference, CPR is just starting to get traction. I'm more concerned about future classes.
why exactly?
ISU is not beating Iowa on in state recruiting. But I have to say, if they do get more instate kids (because they have to, because they can't recruit good out of state players, whatever) maybe they will have an advantage in the rivalry game each year. If they have a roster full of guys that want to win the game, players that care about the rivalry, homegrown kids, then they could beat Iowa. Assuming that Iowa has out of state kids that have never heard of ISU. It's a problem, and I think it is the cause of Iowa's struggles with beating ISU.
Get you lube ready because if he replies with what I think he is going to reply with your keyboard is about to be covered in goo...
Who really cares what school wins the battle for Iowa kids. Is Iowa suddenly some hot-bed for fb talent?
False....
1) Darboh- Michigan
2)Hill- ISU
3)Rogers- ISU
4)Harrington-Track Alabama
5) Carber-undecided
6)Seeley- ISU
7)Malloy- Iowa
8)Shaw-undecided
9)Rathje- undecided
10)Burnside-undecided
Both Hill and Bevins are listed a soft verbals to ISU.
Why are you listening to the awful KXNO morning show?
Bevins and Hill were fallback recruits for Iowa. The top recruits in Iowa never give ISU serious consideration.
Exactly, Iowa is one of the worst states in the country with a BCS school (let alone 2) in recruiting talent.
If you have ever been involved in the recruitment process or known someone who has, then you will probably agree that Reese Morgan has over-stayed his welcome. He usually has a list of 20 Iowa hs football players he calls weekly, shows interest, says promising stuff, but when signing day comes close if you have been dwindled out don't expect him to call and let you know where you stand, and definitely don't ever expect a return phone call. That is why so many Iowa HS coaches are put off now by him.
Contrary to that is Paul Rhoads. I knew one young man that was being recruited heavily by alot of heavy hitters in college football, including Iowa. He took a complimentary in-state visit to ISU and by the end of the visit his old man was dead set that Paul Rhoads was best person and most honest person he had met in the entire recruiting process. Had he stayed in-state ISU would have won that recruiting battle.
Exactly, Iowa is one of the worst states in the country with a BCS school (let alone 2) in recruiting talent.
Starting QB
2nd best WR
TE who had most receptions
Guard
Center
Defensive end
MLB
OLB
FS
SS
all those are starters on Iowa's team that are Iowa. If Iowa has so little instate talent than why does Iowa keep signing these kids and why has Iowa been so succesful with them? That's near 1/2 the starting lineup.
Some of Iowa's best teams come with Iowa talent being their best talent.
Starting QB
2nd best WR
TE who had most receptions
Guard
Center
Defensive end
MLB
OLB
FS
SS
all those are starters on Iowa's team that are Iowa. If Iowa has so little instate talent than why does Iowa keep signing these kids and why has Iowa been so succesful with them? That's near 1/2 the starting lineup.
Some of Iowa's best teams come with Iowa talent being their best talent.
Fallbacks? Is that why they offered them so early in the process?