I think a consensus top 100 recruit is more than just a slight advantage over someone who barely played and never played the PG position. Otherwise it looks comparable but a less experienced team. Not sure why you think this bench has a higher ceiling though
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Iowa Point Guards
- Thread starter BigD
- Start date
I think a consensus top 100 recruit is more than just a slight advantage over someone who barely played and never played the PG position. Otherwise it looks comparable but a less experienced team. Not sure why you think this bench has a higher ceiling though
Fran has said Cook is the most talented player he's ever had, yet Woody was ranked similarly or even higher? Baer was a walk on yet I've read that Fran feels he's too talented to keep out of the starting 5? Yet on other teams, with other coaches, these guys might have different fates. Rankings mean you're talented at something. A coach has to figure out how to use it.I'm not sure what this means
I think a consensus top 100 recruit is more than just a slight advantage over someone who barely played and never played the PG position. Otherwise it looks comparable but a less experienced team. Not sure why you think this bench has a higher ceiling though
I'm using hindsight for Gesell's freshman team because it has already played out. His high school ranking is irrelevant.
I'm using hindsight for Gesell's freshman team because it has already played out. His high school ranking is irrelevant.
But you brought up Woodbury's high school ranking. Mike was really good as a freshman by the way
But you brought up Woodbury's high school ranking. Mike was really good as a freshman by the way
Only because the similarity in ranking with the player I was comparing him to. I agree about Mike being good as a freshman.