Gohawks123
Well-Known Member
I don't overreact to losses...but I will react to what I see on the court. There was absolutely no reason to play zone defense the last 2 games and the coaches did it anyways. It's concerning to this poster.
Rediculous? Yes this is a rediculous post.I hate to say it so early in Fran's tenure but the fact is this game cast many doubts on his pure coaching ability. Things were going to go bad the first year regardless of who was coach but that's why we needed someone to help at least improve the attendance as a starting point. After this game, attendance is going to really struggle for the foreseeable future.
Iowa State was in the same situation but Jamie Pollard took a big risk but great marketing ploy and hired a "splash" with a big name to the Cyclone loyals. It gets them excited and butts in the seat regardless of how they perform. It's turning out to be a brilliant hire now.
Barta needed to hire someone like Hoiberg. BJ Armstrong would have been our Hoiberg hire. Would have got butts in the seats and the losses wouldn't have mattered. Looking at the situation now, I'm thinking this would have provided more of a bandage. Because right now this program is on life support.
Hoiberg was a splash hire in the state of Iowa and the town of Ames. Let's not kid ourselves, it's not like the Cyclones hired Michael Jordan or Larry Bird type celebrity to coach their team. They hired a local celebrity.
I think I'll be more willing to judge Coach McCaffrey if/when our freshmen are seniors. If the youngest on our team don't become the best on our team and play solid games in a winning season at that time, we're in the same place we were with TL. THEN I'll be back here having my psychological meltdown.
The problem is not that Iowa and Fran are not competitive, but that Iowa fans thought that they would be, when the talent didn't even pass my eyeball test, and I watch almost zero college ball.
It really depends on which games you are talking about. Up until the last two games, Iowa was competitive in all the games.The problem is not that Iowa and Fran are not competitive, but that Iowa fans thought that they would be, when the talent didn't even pass my eyeball test, and I watch almost zero college ball.
It really depends on which games you are talking about. Up until the last two games, Iowa was competitive in all the games.
I guess it's all on how you define "being competitive". This season, I (and I assumed most people) saw that as being in the ballgames and not being blown out. In that case, Iowa has been competitive most of this year.By competitive, I meant winning games, not winning halves.
I hate to say it so early in Fran's tenure but the fact is this game cast many doubts on his pure coaching ability. Things were going to go bad the first year regardless of who was coach but that's why we needed someone to help at least improve the attendance as a starting point. After this game, attendance is going to really struggle for the foreseeable future.
Iowa State was in the same situation but Jamie Pollard took a big risk but great marketing ploy and hired a "splash" with a big name to the Cyclone loyals. It gets them excited and butts in the seat regardless of how they perform. It's turning out to be a brilliant hire now.
Barta needed to hire someone like Hoiberg. BJ Armstrong would have been our Hoiberg hire. Would have got butts in the seats and the losses wouldn't have mattered. Looking at the situation now, I'm thinking this would have provided more of a bandage. Because right now this program is on life support.
The problem with hiring a team hero like BJ would be that in three or four years when it becomes clear he was not prepared for the job, and the corner was yet to be turned, you have to fire your one time hero. Pass.
The problem is not that Iowa and Fran are not competitive, but that Iowa fans thought that they would be, when the talent didn't even pass my eyeball test, and I watch almost zero college ball.