Huskers Suspend 2 More
- Thread starter Hawk1960
- Start date
SpiderRico
Well-Known Member
When you can't make up your mind whether a player charged with felony child porn should play in a game or not, you're probably not a good candidate to be a leader of men. Just sayin'......
Here's the whole timeline from the Omaha World Herald ...
https://www.omaha.com/huskers/footb...cle_5457fc74-cc4a-5785-ad9b-e93d339a0c39.html
Man. Dont make me click on a link.
InGoodCo
Well-Known Member
This makes no sense, there is no more info he'd know prior to game time that he doesn't know now. Just come out and say you're playing him.
D
DDThompson
Guest
that’s the gist of it. It might have been his friend’s ex-girlfriend. But yeah, revenge porn by an 18 yr old
No excuse for it.
it’s not the same as child porn from 38-yr old human traffickers
Nebraska is so isolated they have the potential to be much worse. At least those other teams have to worry about getting caught.
Sourcing is important.
MoseSchrute
Well-Known Member
That will make Frosty the Snowjob Man look even worse when Washington goes down in flames.
Caven
Well-Known Member
Based on piecing together the things said in a thread on the Husker site - the guy was sent a video of his girlfriend and 2 of his friends back when he was in high school. He kept the video for many years and then when he was visiting home over the holidays this last year he tried to hook up with his ex. When she wouldn't, he sent her the video from back when she was 15. So he kept a video of a minor for several years (speculation to follow...) and then presumably used it to try to shame her into having sex with him?
Apparently the girl had filed sexual assault charges against the guys in the video and the Husker guy didn't know that so she took it as a threat and that was not the way he meant it. This is the part where it gets murky on how serious the legal ramifications are since it is he said/she said and potential misunderstanding (bad decision making regardless).
Apparently the girl had filed sexual assault charges against the guys in the video and the Husker guy didn't know that so she took it as a threat and that was not the way he meant it. This is the part where it gets murky on how serious the legal ramifications are since it is he said/she said and potential misunderstanding (bad decision making regardless).
SpiderRico
Well-Known Member
I'm pretty sure "intent" doesn't matter in the felony portion of the charge. It's pretty cut and dry. Did he possess and send images or video of a minor engaging in a sex act? If it can be proved that he did (which it sounds like they can), then he's guilty. If they can't prove it, then he's not guilty. The misdemeanor portion of the charge does have to do with intent because it's regarding revenge porn with the intent of causing emotional distress.
Either way, if the felony charge hasn't been settled, you don't play the guy until it is....it's that simple. And frankly, if Washington would have cooperated a lot sooner (the article shows that he ignored numerous communication requests from law enforcement) then this may have been able to be handled a lot sooner as well.
hawkeyebob62
Well-Known Member
Step by step:
1) Insert thumb in mouth
2) Wet thoroughly
3) Remove wet thumb fro mouth
4) Hold thumb aloft
5) Check wind direction
6) Decide accordingly
kicker22
Well-Known Member
Just one problem. They aren't winning.
kicker22
Well-Known Member
Refused to click the link, but did it mention that they won NC's in the 90s?
kicker22
Well-Known Member
Nope, but definitely the perfect candidate to be leading the Huskers.
No doubt, that goes without saying ... and Tommie Frazier should have won the Heisman.
Last edited:
Knight78
Well-Known Member
7) Stick thumb up a$$.
koralakers
Well-Known Member
Nothing to see here. Simple...if the players are ‘scrubs’, boot them from team to ‘make a statement’. If the players are stars, handle w ‘in-house’ punishment and suspend for them for Towson State game.
