lightning1
Well-Known Member
I'll keep a running list as the season goes on. It won't be short.I’m still trying to figure out who “everyone” is?
I'll keep a running list as the season goes on. It won't be short.I’m still trying to figure out who “everyone” is?
Baer: Born 3/1996, age 22 or a Graduate student.
Moss: Born 8/1996 age 22 or a SR
Cook: Born 9/1997 age 21 or a JR
Bohannon: Born 6/1997 age 21 or a JR
Connor: Born 7/1998 age 20 or a SO
Pemsl: Born 8/1997 age 21 or a JR
Garza: Born 12/1998 age 19 or a SO
Kriener: Born 4/1998 age 20 or a JR
Dailey: Born 2/1998 age 20 or a JR
Nunge: Born 2/1999 age 19 or a SO
Frederick: Born 7/1999 age 19 or a FR
Wieskamp: Born 8/1999 age 19 or a FR
That's 2 SRs. 5 JRs. 3 SOs. 2 FR. This is not a young team. Many of them are old for their class age range, with summer birthdays. This is not a young team.
I hadn’t heard anyone saying this team was young.Someone was already calling Moss a "young player" in another thread. Trust me, it's being used and will continue to be used. They'll point to Connor and JW's playing time as evidence of our team being young. Some people will make excuses every year. Regardless.
I hadn’t heard anyone saying this team was young.
My concern is that this team was so far away from even being decent last year that it’s going to take a mighty improvement to be a good team this year. Maybe Joe and a fresh season is the answer, but I’m still pretty skeptical.
There are only a few players that can potentially use the "young" excuse this year. No way the team as a whole can use that term. I guess we'll see where this list ends up by the end of the year.
OP must think it's last year.I’m yet to see Iowa described as young this season? What even brought this up?
OP must think it's last year.
You start a post titled:
EVERYONE IS UNDER THE ASSUMPTION THAT WE ARE A "YOUNG TEAM". LETS LOOK AT IT.
When no one has said anything about being a young team and now your going to start a list of who uses that as an excuse this year.
I want first on that list:
The only reason we will lose any games this year is because we're a young team
As long as you tally it against those who don't say anything about a young team - fair is fair. Anyone saying we're a young team prolly doesn't know much about the team or college hoops in general.I'll keep a running list as the season goes on. It won't be short.
You start a post titled:
EVERYONE IS UNDER THE ASSUMPTION THAT WE ARE A "YOUNG TEAM". LETS LOOK AT IT.
When no one has said anything about being a young team and now your going to start a list of who uses that as an excuse this year.
I want first on that list:
The only reason we will lose any games this year is because we're a young team
Mark my words, I'll have copy/pasted posts from people calling this year's team "young". Especially after a bad loss. It's coming. It's as certain as the "refs screwed us again" posts from Husker fans.OP must think it's last year.
Mark my words, I'll have copy/pasted posts from people calling this year's team "young". Especially after a bad loss. It's coming. It's as certain as the "refs screwed us again" posts from Husker fans.
Thank you