Northside Hawk
Well-Known Member
True but not necessarily in the same year. See Kansas in 1988, to name one example.If you don't have a coach capable of winning a conference title, you don't have a coach capable of winning a National Title.
True but not necessarily in the same year. See Kansas in 1988, to name one example.If you don't have a coach capable of winning a conference title, you don't have a coach capable of winning a National Title.
If you don't have a coach capable of winning a conference title, you don't have a coach capable of winning a National Title.
They got nothing for it because they lost nearly every game they played against top 25-50 teams. Beating the cupcakes isn't good enough. And it has nothing to do with conference titles. Nebraska couldn't win tge conference title because they couldn't beat MSU or Purdue.This is EXACTLY my point. Unbalanced schedules really make it tough to say that one 15-3 team is undisputedly better than a even 13-5 team. Nebraska just won 13 B1G games and got NOTHING for it if you ask me.
Im not going to look up his conference schedule right now but Tim Miles must have had one of the easiest. What deal with the devil did he make?They got nothing for it because they lost nearly every game they played against top 25-50 teams. Beating the cupcakes isn't good enough. And it has nothing to do with conference titles. Nebraska couldn't win tge conference title because they couldn't beat MSU or Purdue.
Don't get me wrong, a conference title would be nice. I would just rather have other accomplishments over it, that is for sure. Lets just say you have these two options, which would you pick?
1) Win a conference title, get to the sweet 16 and lose
2) Don't win the conference, get to the Elite 8 or Final 4?
I'd value 1 extra win in the NCAA tournament over a conference title.[/QUOTE
Im not going to look up his conference schedule right now but Tim Miles must have had one of the easiest. What deal with the devil did he make?
Well those are teams that are in the National discussion year after year. When Iowa joins that discussion one random year and gets crushed, it validated the thinking that it was one lucky year. Like it or not, that’s the narrative, I didn’t create it.LOL, so you have anecdotal evidence from what 5 people? So did MSU's conference title even count in 2015 then, as they got destroyed in the playoffs. OSU has gotten destroyed in the playoffs. OU has gotten housed 40-8, and 37-11 in the playoffs. Were all those teams "pretenders" as well?
It is like people don't even watch or understand football on this board. Teams get housed all the time, even in the playoffs, and even more so in Bowl games, that don't mean crap really. Iowa beating BC was nice this year, but it meant nothing really, just like Fry getting housed in the Rose Bowl several times doesn't mean much.
I know it has been a long time since Iowa has won the B1G, and some on here act like if you don't win the B1G then you aren't doing anything. I would argue different, so I guess my question is would Virginia's season satisfy those who want a conference title desperately? I say that season would suck. Winning the regular season conference title, winning the conference tournament but getting bounced in round 1 is a historic fail of a season if you ask me. I'd much prefer finishing 5th in the conference, and going to the sweet 16.
Not in the same season, of course. But the chances are really good that every NC head coach has won a P5 conference title.True but not necessarily in the same year. See Kansas in 1988, to name one example.
You found 1 example and that 1 example proves my point. 1 example in how many years of NCAA championships? 80?Kevin Ollie says hi.
I'd bet you about anything that the vast majority of the last 10 national title winners were cheating and paying players. Coaches look a lot better when they have elite talent on the team.
Tarkanian. But had UNLV been in a power five he would have won multiple conference titles with some of the teams he had.Not in the same season, of course. But the chances are really good that every NC head coach has won a P5 conference title.
They played 7 teams that were ranked at the time they played. They beat Minnesota, early in the season. We all know how bad they turned out to be, so they don't count. And they beat Michigan at home.Im not going to look up his conference schedule right now but Tim Miles must have had one of the easiest. What deal with the devil did he make?
You found 1 example and that 1 example proves my point. 1 example in how many years of NCAA championships? 80?
The last 10? I'd say the last 50. But I'd say that over half of the NCAA tournament field has been cheating over the past 50 years.
I know it has been a long time since Iowa has won the B1G, and some on here act like if you don't win the B1G then you aren't doing anything. I would argue different, so I guess my question is would Virginia's season satisfy those who want a conference title desperately? I say that season would suck. Winning the regular season conference title, winning the conference tournament but getting bounced in round 1 is a historic fail of a season if you ask me. I'd much prefer finishing 5th in the conference, and going to the sweet 16.
You go ahead and root for whomever you like and I'll do the same. You feel free to limit your expectations to whatever Gutless Gary tells you they should be. I'll decide what my expectations are.Look at the list of National title winners, it is littered with Blue Bloods. They recruit at a different level than what Iowa can by either cheating or being a Blue Blood. If your argument is an Iowa coach should be BOTH a conference title winner, and a national champion, you might want to just become a Duke fan instead.
Instead of deflecting, why not address the point. Winning a conference in basketball just doesn't carry much importance any longer. Nobody is going to give two shits that Virginia won and incredibly tough ACC this year because they got bounced in the first round. It is what it is.
Why is this turning into a football thing? People outside of Iowa don't care if Iowa gets beat down in the Rose Bowl. Teams get bad beats all the time in football in bowl games, Bama, OU, all of them, it happens all the time.