Bohannon crow anyone?

[Hawk5656]

Moore got hurt against Arizona this weekend. Not sure how long he'll be out but that's a huge blow to Cal who appears to be on the right side of the bubble now.

Gibbs: 16.1 PER
Moore: 15.9 PER
Pritchard: 13.7 PER
Vital: 13.6 PER
Carr: 13.1 PER
Jackson: 13.1 PER
Bohannon: 11.9 PER
Simpson: 11.0 PER
Green: 10.7 PER

 

[Hawk5656]

I see you left this one alone @deanvogs but it sounds like Moore is going to play the next game

 

[Hawk5656]

Who is having a better year playing when the games matter in conference play?

16.8 PER - Jordan
13.5 PER - Winston
12.6 PER - Pritchard
8.1 PER - Moore

So you only use PER when it fits your narrative?

 

[Hawk5656]

Best 4* PG offensive rating, Jordan Bohannon is 9th out of 16 on this list. So 8 4* PG better offensively than him and 7 that are worse.

Markus Howard 130.0
Jared Harper 119.3
Anthony Cowan 114.6
Lamar Peters 114.6
Alterique Gilbert 113.1 ***** has only played 3 games.
Myles Powell 112.7
Payton Pritchard 108.6
Cassius Winston 106.3
Jordan Bohannon 105.5
Charlie Moore 101.2
Xavier Simpson 100.3
Jaylen Fisher 98.0
Tony Carr 96.3
Markell Johnson 94.0
Quentin Goodin 87.8
Carsen Edwards 94.3

Here you go

 

[Hawk5656]

I agree. It really shows that Bohannon should have been a consensus 4 star. Turns out only ESPN got his recruiting ranking right.

Here's PC agreeing PER is a great stat

 

[Hawk5656]

Jordan is way better offensively than the bottom 9 4* PG. He is up with the more elite 4* PG when it comes to offensive production.

There are only (5) 4* PG who are even in Jordan's league offensively in conference play. Cowan, Peters, Harper, Howard and Pritchard. The other 9 are at least 10 or more points away from him. Jordan at 108.3 Orate, and Charlie is next at 97.7 Orate.

It isn't even close, Jordan is outproducing most 4* PG offensively in conference play.

Here you go again

 

[PCHawk]

You just quotes a bunch of posts that were trolling the troll.

 

[deanvogs]

You just quotes a bunch of posts that were trolling the troll.

Im pretty sure on some of them I even said PER isn't a stat I believe in, BUT I KNOW U LOVE IT (referring to 56)

 

[HawkeyeWalker]

Was really interested to see how many posts would be be just 5656....almost a whole week.

 

[deanvogs]

So you only use PER when it fits your narrative?

I use PER to troll you....and it seems to be working.

 

[Hawk5656]

I use PER to troll you....and it seems to be working.

Would you rather have Winston or Bohannon? Now seems like a good time to ask

 

[deanvogs]

Would you rather have Winston or Bohannon? Now seems like a good time to ask

That reminds me.....I though you weren't going to respond to me until I answered this question?

 

[Hawk5656]

That reminds me.....I though you weren't going to respond to me until I answered this question?

I'm weak, what can I say

 

[deanvogs]

I'm weak, what can I say

Didn't Nairn take Winston's starting spot? I don't think that is a ringing endorsement, considering Nairn has a 9.9 PER this year and is a career 7.2 PER guy.

 

[Hawk5656]

Didn't Nairn take Winston's starting spot? I don't think that is a ringing endorsement, considering Nairn has a 9.9 PER this year and is a career 7.2 PER guy.

Izzo being Izzo. Daniels started over Wadley and Wadley was better. Winston is still getting over 20 mpg

 

[deanvogs]

Izzo being Izzo. Daniels started over Wadley and Wadley was better. Winston is still getting over 20 mpg

All he is getting is 20 MPG, so IZZO can play a PG with a 9.9 PER over him? Maybe you should explain to IZZO what PER is?

 

[Hawk5656]

All he is getting is 20 MPG, so IZZO can play a PG with a 9.9 PER over him? Maybe you should explain to IZZO what PER is?

Moss has a conference PER of 8.4, maybe you should explain to Fran what PER is

 

[deanvogs]

Moss has a conference PER of 8.4, maybe you should explain to Fran what PER is

That is a missed opportunity for you, seems like you should have stuck with the Moss is a clear miss stuff for longer.

 

[Hawk5656]

That is a missed opportunity for you, seems like you should have stuck with the Moss is a clear miss stuff for longer.

He's been pretty disappointing lately which sucks.

 

[deanvogs]

When you just hammer one stat like you do to fit your narrative to say that a guy is or isn't good, that is where you lose me, and I'm just gonna troll you if you continue that troll.

As an olive branch, I would say that a Fr. Pg that had the following stats would be welcome on the Hawks as far as I'm concerned:

7.2 PPG
5.3 APG
2.5 TO/G
54% eFG%
38% 3pt%
109 Orate

So would this guy

9.2 PPG
4.5 APG
2.1 TO/G
47.4% eFG%
36.4% 3pt%
103.5 Orate

I'm assuming that you would have to agree this paints a much more detailed picture of the players.