I assure you, she is real.
If you choose to believe the lack of evidence showing these overwhelmed hospitals and ignore all the evidence to the contrary, that's your choice. If you truly believe this is as deadly as we're told, I would think you would be infuriated by the Tik Tok nurses making light of the situation. Some of those dances obviously took a lot of time to choreograph.
I absolutely question the legitimacy of this plandemic. The evidence as a whole points towards this being a hell of a lot less lethal than we're being told. There's a ton of evidence pointing towards another agenda being played out, but if anyone comments on it, you post a tin foil hat meme. So, don't try to pretend that you're some open minded party. You've made it clear you don't like Trump, so it is no surprise that you wish hydroxychloroquine wasn't a cure for Covid.
Nobody on here has taken more insults during this than I. That's ok though, because it really doesn't matter. Hopefully, we all discover the truth sooner than later.
Let's talk about what we actually know.
About 40,000 people have died already in the US. According to healthdata.org, Iowa will peak in 18 days, which is 2.5 weeks away. It's maybe a little premature to talk about whether hospitals are okay or not. It totally depends on your location. My hospital (employer) is fine, but we aren't in NY, Iowa,
or Florida. I'm in Colorado.
I personally would love for hydroxychloroquine to be a cure for Covid, but I'm also not in the position to mislead a whole country about it like POTUS is...
Speaking of which, 45 has either outright lied or mislead the public in many ways:
1. On Feb 29 he said "we would have zero cases in two weeks." We now have nearly 40k deaths. That's about as wrong as you can get. Do you agree?
2. An untested drug "a game changer." That's hopeful maybe, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, but certainly misleading. Do you agree?
3. "We will be open by Easter." Again, misleading, false...just plain wrong. Do you agree?
You reference an agenda being played out, and I agree. I know that many people are suffering through joblessness, and organizations are suffering. It's terrible and there will be huge consequences.
I just long for a discussion with people that was even a tiny bit reasonable. Closing the country will cause a lot of economic harm. Social distancing has also likely helped a great deal to decrease deaths.
They can both be true, can't they? We're seeing that social distancing may have flattened the curve, and decreased deaths, yet many are making the argument that the outbreak wasn't so bad.
If we social distance and end up with 70-100k dead, isn't that better than 300k dead?