STILLBUSTER
Well-Known Member
Predicted 6-0, then 0-6. Hawks r 1 game off the pace. When they beat one of the back 6, they will be back on pace.
It appears more and more likely (on paper) that they will beat Purdue. However, based on the reliable, annual nut-punch that Kirt delivers to Hawk fans, it's not crazy to think will lose that game. Let's say they deliver against Purdue. All that does is simply get them back on track to 6 wins.
Is it bandwagon to admit they look a lot better than expected and a lot better than 2012? If that's the criteria then I'm guilty. Otherwise, there's zero rational reason to think they will get beyond 6 wins until they actually do it.
If they do, GREAT!!. If they don't, I still cheer for them to win.
It appears more and more likely (on paper) that they will beat Purdue. However, based on the reliable, annual nut-punch that Kirt delivers to Hawk fans, it's not crazy to think will lose that game. Let's say they deliver against Purdue. All that does is simply get them back on track to 6 wins.
Is it bandwagon to admit they look a lot better than expected and a lot better than 2012? If that's the criteria then I'm guilty. Otherwise, there's zero rational reason to think they will get beyond 6 wins until they actually do it.
If they do, GREAT!!. If they don't, I still cheer for them to win.