SpecialKHawk
Well-Known Member
I think what is being lost is the fact that some of us think TD will provide an element that we have been missing from the point and that fact is not a slight on MG. MG has been a really solid player and maybe better than expected but his game does not feel like a true point guard, more like a 2 guard. We need a guy that can attack off of the bounce creating finishing opportunities and open shots for others especially in the half court when our transition game gets bogged down.
There is a role and need for MG but if TD is what we think he can be then there is going to be a real dilemma at the point. It will be too difficult to keep TD off of the court.
If Fran was just looking to add depth he did not need to offer TD.... He could have offered an incoming freshman and had a heart-to-heart with AC. This offer was about what we are lacking at the point to get over the top in close games.
There is a role and need for MG but if TD is what we think he can be then there is going to be a real dilemma at the point. It will be too difficult to keep TD off of the court.
If Fran was just looking to add depth he did not need to offer TD.... He could have offered an incoming freshman and had a heart-to-heart with AC. This offer was about what we are lacking at the point to get over the top in close games.