Wirfs suspended one game

Fryowa said:
I would have given Wirfs 2 games.


He'll get a deferred judgement, and if he stays out of trouble for 365 days it'll get wiped off his record like it never happened. That's pretty standard nowadays as long as he didn't get in an accident or wasn't doing something like driving 80 down the wrong side of a highway or something.
Click to expand...

I could have lived with that. Still a bit excessive though if you compare it nationally, but if Kirk wanted to set a higher standard then I could have lived with it. However he chose to keep it pretty light and I am ok with that as well. I'm usually lenient for first offenses especially those not done out of malice.
 
scott50322a said:
Riley should have been a 1 game suspension for just being drunk in public. Wirfs should be a 3 game for drinking and putting lives in danger for the OWI. 2 completely different levels of stupidity deserve 2 different levels of punishment.
Click to expand...
Yeah I'm totally with ya on that. The amount of games I can see debated but not the fact that one is way worse than the other... For them to be both just one game is just lazy I think on the coaches part. Taking the easy way out
 
HawkGold said:
Drinking is not illegal. Being drunk in public is. It is the law. https://www.lawserver.com/law/state/iowa/ia-code/iowa_code_123-46

Aside, I'm sure he did break team rules which likely included being drunk I don't expect anyone to know what their limits are when they've been drinking to excess. Besides, not your Bro. There aren't different penalties for first time drinkers. Maybe you have info that someone forced him to drink.
Click to expand...
How much Matlock do you watch, Perry?
 
Hawkfnntn said:
Yeah I'm totally with ya on that. The amount of games I can see debated but not the fact that one is way worse than the other... For them to be both just one game is just lazy I think on the coaches part. Taking the easy way out
Click to expand...

I agree the 2 offenses are not equal. I'm ok with the 1 game suspension for Wirfs, but then Rieff's should have been lowered or removed all together.
 
HawkGold said:
How old are you?
Click to expand...
37.

Before you berate me for being sophomoric,

1) I know. I don't care.

2) My clowning is sooooo much easier to tolerate than your insufferable, incessant lectures and one-upsmanship. You're the guy at parties who's the only correct one in the room and feels the need to educate everyone on shit you know nothing about. Every time there's a story told you have one that's bigger and more specific than the last. You can't see the forest of your own embarrassment for the trees of your fiction (wow, how poetic was that?).

I'd rather laugh at fart humor than listen to your gig. Sorry if you don't feel that way.
 
Last edited:
Fryowa said:
37.

Before you berate me for being sophomoric,

1) I know. I don't care.

2) My clowning is sooooo much easier to tolerate than your insufferable, incessant lectures and one-upsmanship. You're the guy at parties who's the only correct one in the room and feels the need to educate everyone on shit you know nothing about. Every time there's a story told you have one that's bigger and more specific than the last. You can't see the forest of your own embarrassment for the trees of your fiction (wow, how poetic was that?).

I'd rather laugh at fart humor than listen to it. Sorry if you don't feel that way.
Click to expand...

Clowning? OK
hqdefault.jpg


You spend a lot of time not caring.
 
HawkGold said:
Clowning? OK

You spend a lot of time not caring.
Click to expand...
Good one, Mary. With all of your advanced degrees you should be able to come up with something better than duckingthe point of #2 in my post. You dodge criticism like you do reality.
 
Fryowa said:
Good one, Mary. With all of your advanced degrees you should be able to come up with something better than duckingthe point of #2 in my post. You dodge criticism like you do reality.
Click to expand...

What criticism could someone take that has never done anything wrong?
 
Fryowa said:
37.

Before you berate me for being sophomoric,

1) I know. I don't care.

2) My clowning is sooooo much easier to tolerate than your insufferable, incessant lectures and one-upsmanship. You're the guy at parties who's the only correct one in the room and feels the need to educate everyone on shit you know nothing about. Every time there's a story told you have one that's bigger and more specific than the last. You can't see the forest of your own embarrassment for the trees of your fiction (wow, how poetic was that?).

I'd rather laugh at fart humor than listen to your gig. Sorry if you don't feel that way.
Click to expand...

I usually rather enjoy your clowning.

He absolutely cannot be a real person, no way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Share this page

Top