Whoops Wisconsin wr



Hmmm, sounds a little more serious than OWI on a scooter. Guessing he won't play in the Iowa game.
 








EstronHawkKing said:
I wish they would lose their starting offensive line and RB, add their head coach get's the flu the night before our game with them & I would like our chances much better.
Click to expand...

Does this mean Iowa has given up on the idea that Iowa is the better team in a fair fight?
 






Yikes... Hope it's not true so there isn't a victim out there.... I'm not someone that's going to sit here and say 'That's great hope he's out for our game guy'... Rather play them at full strength and beat em that way anyway
 






MelroseHawkins said:
Stated incident happened in April. Why is it now just coming to the surface?
Click to expand...

It's only now that prosecutor(s) have declared intent to indict/file.

If it were ISU, they'd say U of I athletic department influenced them to wait. In this particular case, i think Frost is the one making it happen now. :)

Actually, it would be better for Wiscy had it come to light earlier. Better to get it out of the way in May/June versus having it "hang" through September, possibly October.
 


What's somewhat mystifying is that it took the investigation 3 months to charge the guy.

Regardless, it won't be a big loss, disappointing but not a big loss IF the team loses him. Wisconsin is well stacked at WR this year and was trying to figure out how to get all of a crowded unit on the field. We lost him last year for the last half of the season and did just fine. We have the same plus returning.

BTW, I have NO leaning one way or another toward what transpired. I sincerely hope the truth comes out. No IS NO IF that is what all this is about.
 
Last edited:


Unknownbadger said:
What's somewhat mystifying is that it took the investigation 3 months to charge the guy.

Regardless, it won't be a big loss, disappointing but not a big loss IF the team loses him. Wisconsin is well stacked at WR this year and was trying to figure out how to get all of a crowded unit on the field. We lost him last year for the last half of the season and did just fine. We have the same plus returning.

BTW, I have NO leaning one way or another toward what transpired. I sincerely hope the truth comes out. No IS NO IF that is what all this is about.
Click to expand...
With all due respect, I think you are underestimating how big of a loss this could be. Personally, I hope he can clear his name if he was not involved. He was your leading WR for receiving TDs (6) and yards (501) last year, despite missing 5 games, and one of the best targets in FBS coming back ...

 


Hawk1960 said:
With all due respect, I think you are underestimating how big of a loss this could be. Personally, I hope he can clear his name if he was not involved. He was your leading WR for receiving TDs (6) and yards (501) last year, despite missing 5 games, and one of the best targets in FBS coming back ...

Click to expand...
As I indicated, losing Cephus would be disappointing. If that were to happen though, it couldn't happen during a better year. We are strong at WR with multiple receivers that could be labelled #1. Most Badger fans would like this issue to dissolve for Cephus' sake, but we can get along without him. And have.

BTW, just so you know, he was the MOST EXPERIENCED receiver we had the first half of the season, too. Time for you to look at the second half when he wasn't there.
 
Last edited:


Unknownbadger said:
What's somewhat mystifying is that it took the investigation 3 months to charge the guy.

Regardless, it won't be a big loss, disappointing but not a big loss IF the team loses him. Wisconsin is well stacked at WR this year and was trying to figure out how to get all of a crowded unit on the field. We lost him last year for the last half of the season and did just fine. We have the same plus returning.

BTW, I have NO leaning one way or another toward what transpired. I sincerely hope the truth comes out. No IS NO IF that is what all this is about.
Click to expand...

I hate to be too vulgar, but I once had a girl grab me and physically put it in herself as she was saying no. Girls can be weird.
 


Back when Wisconsin sucked


37694391_230838374203022_3974018550477094912_n.jpg
 


PCHawk said:
I hate to be too vulgar, but I once had a girl grab me and physically put it in herself as she was saying no. Girls can be weird.
Click to expand...

You are sure it was a girl, right. Just making sure. Also, was there an air of disappointment when she said, no. She may have been surprised about something that caught her off guard. It wasn't "oh, geez, no", you know with a long sigh afterward? Do you remember?
 






You must log in or register to reply here.


Latest posts

Share this page






Top