HomerChampless
Well-Known Member
Not my argument. Arguing with the poster proposing I was proposing 2 players in the post at the same time.
And there you are.Tuttle plays 5 for UNI. Plenty of teams use their 4 to help space the floor as well, there are very few teams that consistently run an offense with two post players anymore. White gets plenty of looks from 3 at the 4 spot, he just hasn't taken them until recently. Your post is a very outdated notion of what a 4 should be.
Not my argument. Arguing with the poster proposing I was proposing 2 players in the post at the same time.
Sigh. A 4 - a power forward - goes to the basket with enough regularity and effectiveness to be.. effective. The stature and weight of a player has nothing to do with being a power forward. Seth Tuttle is a power forward. He's got the moves down low and is willing to go to the basket. Charles Barkley would've made a great power forward in the pros (he was one at Auburn). That player from ISU who lost all that weight in his boobies was a good power forward. Still is to some degree - still has those down low moves.
Many on this board want to make Uthoff Iowa's next 4. That means Uthoff has to devote a good part of his game to post play. Also means when down near the post, he can't shoot from the outside. And this is what you want???
Sidenote: while Uthoff learns to be effective in the post, he'll be ineffective. Which means he'll be more comfortable shooting from the outside which means Iowa will have less FT attempts than this season and this is, also, something you want???
And we won't be fine with Uthoff at the four, either. Taking arguably the best outside shooter Iowa has and forcing him inside where he's not so good is not fine for Iowa.
Tuttle plays 5 for UNI. Plenty of teams use their 4 to help space the floor as well, there are very few teams that consistently run an offense with two post players anymore. White gets plenty of looks from 3 at the 4 spot, he just hasn't taken them until recently. Your post is a very outdated notion of what a 4 should be.
This traditional post argument is a strawman to my argument. I'm not saying post play hasn't changed, 'cause it has, I'm saying a 4 or 5 isn't going to spend a good deal of time beyond the 3 point line (as Uthoff likes to do now).
Frank Kaminski. End of argument. 4s and 5s can spend a good amount of time behind the 3pt line if they have the talent to do so.This traditional post argument is a strawman to my argument. I'm not saying post play hasn't changed, 'cause it has, I'm saying a 4 or 5 isn't going to spend a good deal of time beyond the 3 point line (as Uthoff likes to do now).
There really isn't that many traditional 4(s) in the NBA anymore. Tim Duncan and he is about 160 years old. Randolph is the only other one I could think of. Cousins/Noah are debatable if you consider them traditional 4(s).
When they did the ally oop to Uthoff i said "we just caught a glimpse of next year".
This traditional post argument is a strawman to my argument. I'm not saying post play hasn't changed, 'cause it has, I'm saying a 4 or 5 isn't going to spend a good deal of time beyond the 3 point line (as Uthoff likes to do now).
This traditional post argument is a strawman to my argument. I'm not saying post play hasn't changed, 'cause it has, I'm saying a 4 or 5 isn't going to spend a good deal of time beyond the 3 point line (as Uthoff likes to do now).
By Big 10 play it could be a freshman in Uhl's spot...not because Uhl can't play but because said freshman is too good to not start.