hawktransplant
Well-Known Member
Exactly, that's what I was saying. It's fun but you can't argue it finds the best team.
I agreee with that. We find a tournament Champ.
Exactly, that's what I was saying. It's fun but you can't argue it finds the best team.
I agreee with that. We find a tournament Champ.
Are you serious??? You don't win games on paper dude, you do it on the court. Missouri didn't even have that bad of a game, Norfolk St earned that victory.
Exactly, that's what I was saying. It's fun but you can't argue it finds the best team.
That's what I'm saying though...there is NO way VCU was one of the best 4 teams last season...nice story...but not one of the top teams.You're kidding right that was a great game. Who knows NFS may be this years VCU.
You'd probably take Hickory's W away from them too!
No, his point is valid. If they played ten times mizzou would probably win 8.
So USA never beat Russia for the Miracle on Ice, The Patriots actually won their last two matchups in the SB not the Giants, Iowa went undefeated in the regular season in '02...the list could go on and on.
I get your point, sometimes the 'better' team gets upset. That's why they're called upsets, but that's part of sports and why the games are played. On paper Missouri is definitely the better team, but you have to show up and play the game. Today Norfolk St was better and that's all that matters.
So USA never beat Russia for the Miracle on Ice, The Patriots actually won their last two matchups in the SB not the Giants, Iowa went undefeated in the regular season in '02...the list could go on and on.
I get your point, sometimes the 'better' team gets upset. That's why they're called upsets, but that's part of sports and why the games are played. On paper Missouri is definitely the better team, but you have to show up and play the game. Today Norfolk St was better and that's all that matters.
And a series evens out that upset factor. Which is one reason why the NBA has a series.
Its funny, I am reading Feinstein's book are Red A. right now. He briefly talks about this very subject.
Yeah I would love to read that. hawktransplant understands the whole thing...the tourney is nice but I just don't think it does the best job of naming a "national champion" if that's the goal. It names a tournament champion, which isn't usually the best team, because the best teams get knocked out by some no name that is sky high on emotion and then go on to lay an egg against another team. (usually)
The best team in the nation is the one that plays good teams for two weeks without loosing. Mizzou didn't do that, they don't deserve to be champs. The NCAA gets it 100% right.
Yeah I would love to read that. hawktransplant understands the whole thing...the tourney is nice but I just don't think it does the best job of naming a "national champion" if that's the goal. It names a tournament champion, which isn't usually the best team, because the best teams get knocked out by some no name that is sky high on emotion and then go on to lay an egg against another team. (usually)