Vandeberg broke his foot today

Well, Son of a IckeHawk anyway!

Time to really get the TE involved. Also the RB's in the passing game. We really need Mitchell now. This is not a good thing at all and not out of choice, but, this ironically could be the one thing that makes Iowa unpredictable, unfortunately. Weird how it could work like that. Coaches can't do it but an injury possible could.If CJ is on and gets hot, this may really screw opposing teams up for a while. Glass half full thinking, I guess. Feel bad for the young man.
 
Iowa has been getting less than 100 yards per game from WRs. Vandy gets 3/4 of that. Can't run the ball 65 percent of time if you don't have a WR threat. I don't know why some of you call this a developmental program when 1 not spectacular but decent WR goes down and there are no answers other than running and TEs. Unless you are Vernon Davis, TEs are relief valves in the passing game, not the main point of attack unless the D gives it to you. Fat chance of that now. Fitz will be all over that.

Um, yeah you can. We did it last year vs Fitz. 51 rushes for 294 yards. 27 passes for 198 yards. We stuffed it down their throat last year, running the ball 65% of the time, and Northwestern couldn't stop it.
 
The one WR that CJ trusted. That stings. Time for Scheel to step up?
Scheel? Right, he's touched the ball what, maybe 3 times this year.. He, like the rest of our receivers, cannot get open. I feel bad for CJ.. Talented, but nobody to throw to.
 
Time to go backyard football. Throw Boyle in and tell him to go to the corner of the house and slant in deep!!

Lol. Sandlot football. Thanks for bringing back memories from my youth. Yea, run down to that tree and square in hard.

"I'm open, I'm open .............I'M OPEN!!!!"

Didn't it seem like you'd twist or sprain your ankle and just continue to hobble around and play on it, then, go in house & the thing would swell up like a balloon and hurt like hell at school the next day.
 
Um, yeah you can. We did it last year vs Fitz. 51 rushes for 294 yards. 27 passes for 198 yards. We stuffed it down their throat last year, running the ball 65% of the time, and Northwestern couldn't stop it.

But....last year Iowa had a threat over the top and a qb that could deliver. Wadley...yes my fav, got 26 carries. 4 games in he's at 37 carries. Iowa rushed for over 200 yards per game against all competition. Haven't seen great teams yet.
 
But....last year Iowa had a threat over the top and a qb that could deliver. Wadley...yes my fav, got 26 carries. 4 games in he's at 37 carries. Iowa rushed for over 200 yards per game against all competition. Haven't seen great teams yet.

Wadley had 8 carries going into the Northwestern game last year and didn't even play in 4 of the 6 games before jNW.

Since when is Vadeberg our over the top threat? Plus jNW stacked the box last year on us, teams always stack the box against us. This team can't throw the ball, so why throw it. Daniels is averaging over 5 YPC and Wadley over 7 YPC. This is against teams who all wanted to stop the run, and includes the awful game vs NDSU. We are good at running the ball and bad at passing the ball. Why not just run it til they stop us then?
 
Scheel? Right, he's touched the ball what, maybe 3 times this year.. He, like the rest of our receivers, cannot get open. I feel bad for CJ.. Talented, but nobody to throw to.

Thats why I finished my post with a question mark. Because it was a question, not a statement. There's a thing called punctuation which dictates the intent of the sentence.

Also, CJ is talented, but last week he overthrew a couple wide open guys and also held onto the ball too long...2 sacks were scored as his own fault according to PFF. Lets not act like the last two games CJ has been perfect.
 
Wadley had 8 carries going into the Northwestern game last year and didn't even play in 4 of the 6 games before jNW.

Since when is Vadeberg our over the top threat? Plus jNW stacked the box last year on us, teams always stack the box against us. This team can't throw the ball, so why throw it. Daniels is averaging over 5 YPC and Wadley over 7 YPC. This is against teams who all wanted to stop the run, and includes the awful game vs NDSU. We are good at running the ball and bad at passing the ball. Why not just run it til they stop us then?

Vandy is not that threat in realty but he's all they've shown that can do something. Never will I understand not using Wadley more. I agree, why not, just don't expect results.
 
Look, I hate to see this happen to a quality player and a good kid, but I don't think this will really impact the team as much as people say.

Outside of the Iowa state game this year iowas passing game has been pretty bad. It's not like vandeberg was dez Bryant. He's had his share of drops and is not a playmaker. I think this is going to force Davis and CJB to explore different and maybe better options downfield. One of these young WRs has to have skills. Don't know which one, but statistically it just has to be true.

So far iowas bread and butter has been running Daniels and wadley. Vandeberg has not been a consistent weapon
 
Well guess we’ll have to get creative with play calling and Smith and Scheel need to man up. Did Iowa even take a deep shot against Rutgers? I know they had that one completion of 20 or 30 yards to Smith. But I’m talking down the field to a WR when they are one on one. I wonder if it’s our pass blocking that makes them being nervous to call for 7 step drops. Rutgers was daring Iowa to do it they had their safetys really close to the line a lot. Now I’ll be shocked in NW doesn’t do the same they have no reason not to.
 
Well guess we’ll have to get creative with play calling and Smith and Scheel need to man up. Did Iowa even take a deep shot against Rutgers? I know they had that one completion of 20 or 30 yards to Smith. But I’m talking down the field to a WR when they are one on one. I wonder if it’s our pass blocking that makes them being nervous to call for 7 step drops. Rutgers was daring Iowa to do it they had their safetys really close to the line a lot. Now I’ll be shocked in NW doesn’t do the same they have no reason not to.
They had their safeties close to the line and yet they still couldn't stop the run. We should've had 80 run attempts against them. We would've scored more points.
 
Look, I hate to see this happen to a quality player and a good kid, but I don't think this will really impact the team as much as people say.

Outside of the Iowa state game this year iowas passing game has been pretty bad. It's not like vandeberg was dez Bryant. He's had his share of drops and is not a playmaker. I think this is going to force Davis and CJB to explore different and maybe better options downfield. One of these young WRs has to have skills. Don't know which one, but statistically it just has to be true.

So far iowas bread and butter has been running Daniels and wadley. Vandeberg has not been a consistent weapon

Vandeberg wasn't Dez Bryant but he still was a very good college WR who's been very consistent this season. He's very talented
 
I love vandeberg as much as anyone, but he had zero impact on the game Saturday at Rutgers

That's because a lot of the time they took him out of the game by putting a corner on him and having safety help over the top. It wasn't because he isn't good it is because he is the only Iowa WR that could consistently get open.
 
We should completely abandon the passing game, and run the ball 40-50 times a game. If you run it that much, the play action game will be what gets these WR open.

I get why you're saying that but it's way too simplistic.

Season-to-date, it's already been 57% - 43% rushing. They've already been riding that "strength". Result - currently ranked 86th in the country, which is a little less impotent than the 98th ranked passing attack.

Hawks went 50/50 vs NDSU and they destroyed Iowa's rushing attack. Now you wanna go even more rushing against teams with D's of equal (and much better) rushing defenses?

The more rushing Iowa does the more likely they will be in 3rd & 5+ situations. This means fewer 1st downs / more 3 & outs, which puts even more pressure on a suspect defense to win the game. This defense is not good enough on the DL, OLB and at safety to pull it off.

Still, the situation is what it is and running the ball must now be Iowa's primary offensive strategy. However, the answer is not in quantity. Sure, you'll need to run more but there's no success going much above 60 or 62%. The success will come from power and creativity.

Dump the single-back sets entirely and go exclusively single-I / 2-TE sets with healthy doses of power-I sweeps and quick pitches added to utilize the field with Wadley. If they continue to insist on a between-the-tackles base rushing attack, Iowa is gonna get stuffed.

As for play-action. Again, sounds good in theory but, long-developing plays where CJ needs protection hasn't exactly been the recipe for success for this season. Even when he does have some time and there's some competent execution, it's pretty obvious there's something off between CJ and the WR's -- trust? overthinking and holding too long? little separation by the WR's?

Again, you'll get more results form twin TE's and a short, quick-hitting passing game (slants anyone?) that can transition the passing game into a possession game intended to guarantee 5 yards on 1st down.

Imo, this schematic strategy is what this Iowa team should've been running from the git-go. Even when healthy, they simply don't have the speed nor pass protection for downfield, long-developing pass plays. This is a slow, unathletic offense that just needs to power-plow down the field and overwhelm you on the edge with Wadley hiding behind a swinging-fence of big uglies, waiting to burst through the seam.

Unfortunately, this means variation, creativity and schematic adjustment to personnel. Not exactly a well-know trait of derKirkFeravis.

We'll know within the first 2 series on Saturday ... 2 straight attempts to bulldoze into Fitz's 8 man box, followed by a well-known 6-yard hitch that is either incomplete or immediately tackled short of the sticks and the writing for 2016 will pretty much be on the wall.

Go Hawks! Good luck!
 

Latest posts

Top