Stupid argument? It is true
What exactly do you find stupid about that? Give me a short list (beyond Alexander) of her quick, athletic recruits from the past decade.
Baylor has a great team this year but don't confuse that with their program bringing in money. Baylor's mens team and football were both goo dthis year, but there are still hardly any Baylor fans. They do no have a fan following. Adn I believe Mulkey has a massive contract as well, so I don't think there is any way that Baylor is positive on Women's BBall.I understand that there is a small group of fans that give a darn about womens sports. But it's small. talk about a fishbowl. Other then TN and Uconn and what maybe Baylor this yr what womens bball progam even breaks even let alone makes the school any money.
you didnt say "quick athletic". she has brought in NUMEROUS top 100 recruits over the years.
I actually doubt that all of the players you listed where top 100 prospects at the time of their signing. The only one listed as a top 100 recruit in the current media guide is Johnson, and for some reason, she has not seen the floor much this season. You by your own admission are pretty much talking out of your a$$.
When a poster calls my post indicating Bluder has not recruited at a high level for most of her tenure dumb, I want some proof.
Winning the conference has extended her stay for the foreseeable future.
I've half heartedly watched Bluder's teams over the years, and, it seems, they're always near the top of the B1G at season's end, but why doesn't Iowa have more of a physical team?
They'll never beat a tOSU or MSU - perennial physical teams. Iowa always stays in games as long as their 3 point shooting is sharp, and when that goes cold, the team goes south.
Why can't Johnson, the starting center, be more physical? She's 6'5".
What is it you are trying to say? That she is not secure in her position because of a conference championship or that she was never in danger before she won it?