The health of the people in our country

I have taken the Covid shots every single time they have been recommended by my Dr. And my Pharmacy. No side effects. No Covid, as far as I can tell. Also get the standard flu shot annually, throwback from my days working in schools. Not scared. Will continue my process. There you go…
If you're not scared, what's even the point of taking a shot? If I was going to take a covid shot, I would do it because I was scared. There's not really any other reasons to take it other than the fear of covid.
 
Dr Mean's mission is not about the covid vax or any vax for that matter. But you do you. i have not taken a flu shot in 30 years ever since it was my choice not to do so. And would never take the covid vax. But i'll do me. I understand my immune system and it's strong. I make the choice to keep myself healthy by eating healthy (for the most part), exercising, and not pumping a bunch of pharmaceuticals in my body. I don't need a Dr to help me w/ that. The overall health of our country is horrible and our reliant on pharmaceuticals and pushing pharmaceuticals as the answer to nearly every health issue is a huge problem.
It's interesting how strongly a lot of people feel about our healthcare system. Everyone has an opinion. It should be free. Government should run it. Government shouldn't run it. Everything costs too much. Why can't we be like Canada. Very rarely (until recently) does anyone mention that our shitty Healthcare system is 100% the result of the overall health of the country. Our Healthcare system isn't broke. Our health is.

It was the same thing with covid. Everyone arguing about stupid shit and ignoring the real problem. Trump didn't take it seriously. We didn't lock down enough. People won't social distance. People won't mask. We need herd immunity. Hurd immunity is a myth. No one wants to say more Americans are dying because Americans are unhealthy.
 
Thanks for making me aware Dr Means was on Rogan. I'll have to go take a listen. i don't listen to much of Rogan but will when he interviews people i'm interested in. Dr Means and what she's promoting i'm 1,000% on board with.
I go through phases listening to him. Sometimes I'll listen to one a month when it's someone I really want to hear and sometimes I'll listen to 3 a week for a few weeks straight. It can get redundant when you listen too much.
 
@PCHawk , I know you say you cannot view the gift articles I share (perhaps you need to sign up but not pay?), but anyhow, here is a good piece about the problems with our food environment:


I agree with you that RFK, Jr.'s idea to make this a priority is important. My big issue is that many in public health have been pointing to this issue for a long time, but the major food manufacturers and their lobbyists resist any potential regulation, and it is especially the GOP who stands in the way of business regulations (as an anecdote, see the GOP response to Michelle Obama's push to try to make school lunches healthier). Is a GOP-controlled government really going to do such a dramatic about face?

There is also a huge chasm between the idea of improving the food environment and actually accomplishing that goal.

https://freakonomics.com/2013/02/how-to-make-school-lunches-healthier/


I have no confidence in a Trump administration, and particularly in an RFK, Jr, who has no expertise in this area, to actually pull off any meaningful, positive change. But we can always hope!
 
@PCHawk , I know you say you cannot view the gift articles I share (perhaps you need to sign up but not pay?), but anyhow, here is a good piece about the problems with our food environment:


I agree with you that RFK, Jr.'s idea to make this a priority is important. My big issue is that many in public health have been pointing to this issue for a long time, but the major food manufacturers and their lobbyists resist any potential regulation, and it is especially the GOP who stands in the way of business regulations (as an anecdote, see the GOP response to Michelle Obama's push to try to make school lunches healthier). Is a GOP-controlled government really going to do such a dramatic about face?

There is also a huge chasm between the idea of improving the food environment and actually accomplishing that goal.

https://freakonomics.com/2013/02/how-to-make-school-lunches-healthier/


I have no confidence in a Trump administration, and particularly in an RFK, Jr, who has no expertise in this area, to actually pull off any meaningful, positive change. But we can always hope!
Challenge yourself and go listen to the casey means interview I posted. Get through the whole thing before you comment. The articles you posted is some real surface level shit. Of course we can make better consumption choices. However the root of the problem & corruption goes much much deeper than the simple individual choices Americans can make in regards to what they put in their bodies.
 
Their message is the point. The question is what do we do about it. They provided some thoughts and ideas towards the end of the interview. It's interesting as i grew up in the 80-90's many people i recall smoked cigarettes. There were a ton of high schoolers and young adults who smoked cigarettes. You could smoke practically anywhere you wanted. Everywhere you turned you could find someone puffing on a cigarette. Smoking sections available at nearly every restaurant. In today's world it almost seems odd to see someone smoking; especially a young person. Obviously there are still those who choose to smoke but they pay for it. They pay for it through w/ higher insurance premiums, w/ the insane cost for cigarettes, and damage to their health. So how did we turn it around from so many people smoking 30 years ago to not many smoking today? We need to figure out a way to do w/ our food supply that which has been achieved in regards to cigarettes/smoking.

Never have smoked a cigarette in my entire life

After school in the seventh grade, the lads were smoking behind school and the offered me a
cigarette, I politely declined, but they persisted

Handed me a cigarette, I took one puff, and it felt like someone had slammed a sledgehammer to my
chest

I immediately handed the cigarette back and told the lads, You guys go ahead, Knock yourselves out
 
@PCHawk , I know you say you cannot view the gift articles I share (perhaps you need to sign up but not pay?), but anyhow, here is a good piece about the problems with our food environment:


I agree with you that RFK, Jr.'s idea to make this a priority is important. My big issue is that many in public health have been pointing to this issue for a long time, but the major food manufacturers and their lobbyists resist any potential regulation, and it is especially the GOP who stands in the way of business regulations (as an anecdote, see the GOP response to Michelle Obama's push to try to make school lunches healthier). Is a GOP-controlled government really going to do such a dramatic about face?

There is also a huge chasm between the idea of improving the food environment and actually accomplishing that goal.

https://freakonomics.com/2013/02/how-to-make-school-lunches-healthier/


I have no confidence in a Trump administration, and particularly in an RFK, Jr, who has no expertise in this area, to actually pull off any meaningful, positive change. But we can always hope!
I unfortunately agree that the obstacles are probably too much to overcome. But man is RFK admit about doing it. He's also verbally saying he's willing to get assassinated for trying. If he accomplishes that goal, Musk accomplishes his goal of drastically cutting down spending, and Trump accomplishes his goal of ending the wars, then I'd say it will be a really good presidency. If he destroys democracy.... then Oops, my bad.
 
Never have smoked a cigarette in my entire life

After school in the seventh grade, the lads were smoking behind school and the offered me a
cigarette, I politely declined, but they persisted

Handed me a cigarette, I took one puff, and it felt like someone had slammed a sledgehammer to my
chest

I immediately handed the cigarette back and told the lads, You guys go ahead, Knock yourselves out
You've taken exactly one more puff than I have.
 
@PCHawk , I know you say you cannot view the gift articles I share (perhaps you need to sign up but not pay?), but anyhow, here is a good piece about the problems with our food environment:


I agree with you that RFK, Jr.'s idea to make this a priority is important. My big issue is that many in public health have been pointing to this issue for a long time, but the major food manufacturers and their lobbyists resist any potential regulation, and it is especially the GOP who stands in the way of business regulations (as an anecdote, see the GOP response to Michelle Obama's push to try to make school lunches healthier). Is a GOP-controlled government really going to do such a dramatic about face?

There is also a huge chasm between the idea of improving the food environment and actually accomplishing that goal.

https://freakonomics.com/2013/02/how-to-make-school-lunches-healthier/


I have no confidence in a Trump administration, and particularly in an RFK, Jr, who has no expertise in this area, to actually pull off any meaningful, positive change. But we can always hope!
So the headline says ultraprocessed foods aren't the only culprit. I already know of a lot of other culprits. Is this article worth using my free one?
 
So the headline says ultraprocessed foods aren't the only culprit. I already know of a lot of other culprits. Is this article worth using my free one?

No, as @Glass1/2fullguy stated, it is surface level stuff. Basically, hyper-palatability being the issue, which is not necessarily the same as ultra-processed. Being able to combine starch/sugar + fat + salt very cheaply, and then passing it along to the consumer cheaply. If our food system is driven entirely by a profit-motive (which it is), then all of the incentives line up for food companies to produce the cheapest, most hyper-palitable trash possible. There is no conspiracy involved, just everyone responding to the incentives of the system in place. The only way to change is to tweak the system, and there is incredible friction preventing that. The friction not only comes from coorperate interests, but also from libertarian types who don't feel like gubernment should be messing with our food.
 
We might be the only two folks in America who can claim to not smoking even one cigarette

Also never partook, nor have I ever been drunk (have maybe consumed a grand total of 5 alcoholic beverages spread across my 47 years). I had an older cousin who went into AA when I was in 7th grade, it really scared me away from ever considering alcohol and the like.
 
Also never partook, nor have I ever been drunk (have maybe consumed a grand total of 5 alcoholic beverages spread across my 47 years). I had an older cousin who went into AA when I was in 7th grade, it really scared me away from ever considering alcohol and the like.
I'm pretty much drunk every time I post. That probably clears some stuff up for you huh?
 
Seems RFK is already out of favor. I hate his holistic, anti vaccine stuff but frankly if people want to drink raw milk and not have all their food full of sugar and plastics I can get behind.
 
Seems RFK is already out of favor. I hate his holistic, anti vaccine stuff but frankly if people want to drink raw milk and not have all their food full of sugar and plastics I can get behind.

I think there is some consensus on this issue of food-system quality across the political spectrum, maybe it can go somewhere.
 
It's just tribal. When one side tried to bring healthful foods into schools and limit sugary drinks it was stepping on freedoms. Whatever the other side says the other one puts down. I think anyone can see this and it only hurts America with these tribal disputes.

Making health and vaccine choices should not be a fear thing as many have tried to make it. You look at the pros and cons, you review the available data and you make the best choice. Logic, data and science, not fear should guide you.
 
Top