GrandpaHawk
Well-Known Member
It's pretty clear that coach is trying to lite a fire in some of the players butts.Sounds like some of the guys need to step up if they want to see playing time.
My thoughts for what it is worth
I don't care what Ferentz says, the size of that oline will get absolutely manhandled. There is just not enough beef especially in the middle.
I wonder if we have problems with health of Sash and Greenwood if they will move Berstein to safety. Of the CBs he seems most likely to be able to switch and when you have that much depth at CB and so little at safety it seems to make sense.
Yeah, he is only an oline guru who has sent numerous lineman to the pros and coached the position in the NFL, im sure he is clueless when it comes to this position.
Yeah, he is only an oline guru who has sent numerous lineman to the pros and coached the position in the NFL, im sure he is clueless when it comes to this position.
Understand it is early and things change. Also understand the measureables don't look like they've been updated but the offense looks very small to me.
I changed my wording on my original post but my point still stands. What I meant was that coach won't flat come out and say we are in trouble but there is no way you average 280 in the middle and be able to run effectively. And let's face it, other than 2008, the oline hasn't exactly been great for us the last several years since Phillibin left. I am afraid of a disaster oline year like 2007. I am still holding out hope that we won't have a 270 pound center starting for us but it is not looking good. Coupled with at least one guard who is undersized and inexperienced I think that could be really bad.
I'd like to see Wegher and Davis get a shot at punt returns. I think Sandeman is a very solid WR but he has left a ton to be desired on punt returns in my un-important opinion. The lack of fielding the ball in the Orange Bowl cost the squad probably 50+ yards in field position. When it comes down to it, In KF I trust.
I am pretty excited to see that Dominic Alvis is listed on the two deep as a red shirt freshman. He graduate high school with my nephew and I have watched him play a number of times. Plus, he is a great kid. Extremely athletic having won State Track titles in the 110 high hurdles and the discus. Looking forward to great things from this kid!
From everything I've gathered, James Ferentz is bigger than Eubanks ever was.
From everything I've gathered, James Ferentz is bigger than Eubanks ever was. So assuming James ends up winning the spot, we should have adequate "beef" at C. Furthermore, Vandervelde is a guy who has never lacked size at OG. Lastly, Gettis is a 4th year JR who will likely be in the upper 280s by fall. From what everything I've heard about Gettis, it sounds like he's awesome athlete for his size and has great explosion off the line. Provided he gets down the position details too ... I'm under the impression that size really won't be an issue for him.
As for beef at OT ... last I checked Reiff will likely be in the 290s (or so) by the fall ... and even playing a little on the undersized side as a RS FR, he still had great success against tOSU's Heyward ... and there aren't all that many O-linemen who can say that the got the best of Heyward (and probably no other FR can say that). As for the RT spot ... I'm sure that it will be well-manned between Zusevics, Orne, or MacMillan.
There's A LOT more to OL-play than just fielding big bodies ... technique and strength are HUGE ... and the majority of the guys who we have vying for the open spots are either guys whom I'd argue are elite underclassmen or comparatively physically mature upperclassmen. Starting experience is the primary knock on the 2010 Hawk OL.
Lastly, while I liked Philbin a lot too ... I don't understand the logic that suggests that Iowa's OL play went south after he left. That's simply not true. If you notice the correlation between experienced depth on the OL and success on the field ... you soon learn that that is the driving force behind our success .... irrespective of whether Philbin or Morgan was the OL coach. If you don't recall, Iowa's OL wasn't exactly all-world when Betts was the starter ... and Philbin was the OL coach then. Similarly, Morgan had to contend with a bunch of OLs that were both racked with injuries and lacked experienced depth. All the same, Morgan fielded some decent OLs in 2003, 2005, 2008, and 2009. The facts simply don't support the revisionist history that the success of Iowa's OL was purely due to Philbin's coaching.
I know this is early and things will change but...
I was suprised to see that Tarpinian wasn't in line to be a starting LB. I also thought Bernstine would be a starting CB.
As for beef at OT ... last I checked Reiff will likely be in the 290s (or so) by the fall ... and even playing a little on the undersized side as a RS FR, he still had great success against tOSU's Heyward ... and there aren't all that many O-linemen who can say that the got the best of Heyward (and probably no other FR can say that).
Am I the only one who doesn't think Tarpinian should be starting? He's a fine special teams player, but he always seemed to be lacking as a LB (slow, bad angles, bad reads).
How many times have you seen him play meaningful minutes in a game?
Other than special teams, I'm not sure what you have to make that assumption.
I was absolutely thinking the OSU game. He made several terrible reads and took several terrible routes.
I was absolutely thinking the OSU game. He made several terrible reads and took several terrible routes.