if I had to replace one of the top 5, it would be between Greene and Ringer.
In a conference that was loaded with running backs who had multiple really good seasons during this five-year period, someone is going to be left out. Michigan State fans probably think Ringer got the shaft, and Penn State fans probably feel the same about Royster.
The comments are brutal. He's not only not backing down, he's doubling down.
Hart & Mendenhall played just one year in BTN era (like Greene)... and didn't freakin' John Clay lose his starting gig?
That is a joke. BHGP did a nice job of exposing that. And having Helu on HM ticks me off as much as Greene not top 5...he never played a snap in the Big Ten...enough trying to go out of your way to make Nebraska feel important. If they were so important, pay em a full share of revenues
That is a joke. BHGP did a nice job of exposing that. And having Helu on HM ticks me off as much as Greene not top 5...he never played a snap in the Big Ten...enough trying to go out of your way to make Nebraska feel important. If they were so important, pay em a full share of revenues
Yarina's defense, via Twitter:
"B1G inherits Neb's history. Don't hear people complaining about inheriting MSU history prior to 53. Give it time- be same case."
what does how many years they played have anything to do with being the best? If they were one of the best they were one of the best it doesnt matter if they played 4 years or 1 year. Helu is a joke not only because he was never on the BTN but he was never that great at Nebraska. Ball is obvious number one. Greene should be top three no question. Ringer should be in top five over Clay.
That guy is totally doubling down on his stupidity and is of course hanging on to the notion that EVERYONE who thinks Greene was snubbed on his list is a whiny Iowa fan. Brent Vagisil or whatever his name is needs to grow a thicker skin and not resort to childish games like "I know you are but what am I" games.