I don't assume. Execution failed. Scoring droughts were the norm. Players and coaches looked lost.I like how we call people out for assumptions and follow them up with ..... assumptions.
All of that actually happened.
I don't assume. Execution failed. Scoring droughts were the norm. Players and coaches looked lost.I like how we call people out for assumptions and follow them up with ..... assumptions.
I don't assume. Execution failed. Scoring droughts were the norm. Players and coaches looked lost.
All of that actually happened.
I don't think falling apart at the end was due to expectations.
The one thing it clearly was was terrible defense.
Once the offense became a struggle the effort on defense went in the tank. Thats bad leadership out of your seniors. I don't think you are going to see that out of the new leaders of this team.
Which is fine, we were a top 25 team for the majority of the year last year, we just slumped at the worst possible team. We were in position to be a top 5 seed before the last three weeks. We were 4-8 in games in which Marble scored over 20 points, we weren't winning the games where we depended on him to score. That's not Marble's fault, other players (Uthoff and White mainly) were more than happy to not look to score, I think forcing them to step up more often is going to be a good thing for us.
I hope this isn't the case, because were it true, it makes it seem like the players are astoundingly mentally weak, and the coach is feckless.Do you think the team felt pressure when they heard that they were a Final Four team.....
The possibility does exist.....
Do you think the other teams in the Big were rather motivated more than usual to defeat a potential Final Four team.....
The possibility does exist....
Just an opinion, nothing else.....
I believe I was told elsewhere, in this very thread, that Iowa had the 5th most efficient offense in the country last year. So what was it, was the offense efficient, or was it inefficient?
Let's look at the things you say we'll have this year. A new PG who has better quickness? Maybe. We don't know if he's good enough to break guys down at the Big 10 level. I hope he can, but I am not going to assume he can. Last year, I assumed Gesell and Clemmons could.
At least three shooters on the floor? A few things. This assumes that we can break people down off the dribble, which I won't assume, and also, those three shooters all play the same position, so I doubt they'll be on the floor together all the time. I am also not ready to consider Jok and Ellingsworth decent enough shooters to mess with a defense. Heck, I have doubts as to whether Ellingsworth is a Big 10 caliber player who will see court time next year.
The 7'1" center? Again, like your other points, this is based on assumptions. Woodbury hasn't proven he can be a consistent post scoring threat. They guy misses more bunnies than a one armed man hunting on Oregon Trail.
While I am not saying what you are predicting can't happen, I doubt all of it will. As many have said, we're returning 7 of 10 players, and we return too many players for the offense to have a radical transformation. This offense still has more question marks than exclamation points.
Again, based on assumptions. Assumptions that the data at hand do not support. What I see is the team taking a step back talent wise, but still burdened with the same issues they had last year, as I explained before.
Unlike many Iowa fans, I don't think the team "collapsed" last year. I think opposing coaches figured them out. Once that happened, and they couldn't just run up and down the court anymore, the offense was lost. It's very similar to the way San Antonio figured out Miami. How many times did you see Fran standing there in disbelief? The players certainly didn't quit, but they just couldn't execute anymore. Until I see, next season, that they can get past that, I can't assume they'll be a better team next year execution wise as well.
Add in Uthoff and Uhl being forced into minutes at power forward, both very thin in the post, and those concerns only grow .
Half the league is starting wing players at 4 spot. Consider me not worried
Who are the three shooters on the court? I can only assume you mean Gesell, Oglesby/Jok, and Uthoff. Is that really a big upgrade from a Gesell, Marble, Uthoff lineup we saw last season? Who is going to break down a defense?Depends on which part of the season you look at. At the end of the season the efficiency rankings and ppg were bad.
Of course there will be 3 shooters on the court at all times...as long as White never plays the 3, which he won't. Any combination of the remaining players gives you 3 threats.
I've seen enough basketball to feel very good about Woodbury at this point as long as he has room.
Dickerson is an educated guess.
Iowas struggles were on the perimeter defensively not interior, again that gets better with more quickness and White gone from the 3.
Well see but I'm pretty sure I'm gona be right.
How many Big 10 4's are 90kg soaking wet?Half the league is starting wing players at 4 spot. Consider me not worried