HawkeyeWalker
Well-Known Member
If you vote outside of 5-8, you're crazy or trolling.
What's crazy is i bet I could come close to picking them...
What's crazy is i bet I could come close to picking them...
Funny how nobody mentions academics (i.e. how do we do graduating players). Afterall, the NCAA still calls them "student athletes"
7
The KF era is coming to an end. Like KF or not the stability of the program has never been an issue. Even if BF is the next HC there is a lot of uncertainty moving forward.
Pay Jimmy Franklin $20 mill a year?Just. Please, God, no. I was really upset that he got the OC job without any experience. Parker is a better choice if it's anyone on this staff, and I'd not be happy about that hire.
Not really too sure who to hire next, tbh. All the obvious candidates are too old.
Just to name the short listWell we know that playmaker, tk, and okst will be voting 1 since 0 isn't an option.
The poll should have graded Iowa from 1 to 12, then it almost certainly would have rated a 7. As in, an average of 7 wins a year.
I guess converting that to a scale of 10 Iowa would grade a 6.
I don't remember anything like that. How old are we talking?Got out the old Play Action Football game last night for kicks. For the kids here, that was the pre-computer Madden type game. There are 8 offensive play strips and 6 defensive plays.
To play against Iowa, you know KF is almost always going to use the two in red. When playing D it means I only need 2 and I will win assuming the talent level is equal. Makes the game really simple. Until this changes, I can't vote higher than a 6 or 7.
View attachment 2804
I don't remember anything like that. How old are we talking?
Was that before the vibrating football field / table, with 1 player carrying or kicking the little felt ball?
Anybody who votes an 8+ is just in love w/ Hawkeye football, and ignoring the on-field product. Or living in the past (pre-2010).If you vote outside of 5-8, you're crazy or trolling.
Anybody who votes an 8+ is just in love w/ Hawkeye football, and ignoring the on-field product. Or living in the past (pre-2010).
I voted a 3. And yes, that was my honest assessment. Why so low?
Because KF's 7 wins a year is just 1 more than the minimum they should win w/ their schedule. Think about it- 3 weak non-cons, plus Illinois, Purdue, and Minny gets you to 6 wins every year. I would hope everybody would agree there's no excuse for not winning those. So then to get to 7 (or 8) all you have to do is beat NW, Nebby, or Rutgers / Indiana. But doing that gets the coach a bonus? Satisfies the fans? Why?
Because they're boring, conservative, and predictable, i.e. not particularly fun to watch. That's obviously a subjective / to each his own thing so I won't elaborate.
And finally, because it should be obvious to everybody that neither the AD or the coach cares about improving on the 7-win average. BF being the latest, most obvious example of comfort zone outweighing results.
So to summarize, I voted low because of mediocre results, low entertainment value, and 6 years and counting of cruise control coaching.