That should make it into the handbook for players next year......The lesson here: If you play sports, don't use online bookies that require credit cards. Find a classic one that only deals in cash and keeps his little black book of coded names so they can't be traced back.
People will be ready to hang the guy that signed these Complaints when the full truth of this criminal investigation is disclosed.
Gambling creates a unique problem in sports competition. While I favor legalized, and largely unregulated gambling (mostly libertarian) sports are different. The people involved in athletic competition have a much greater likelihood of using inside information on the bet. Much worse, and more likely is their ability to directly affect the outcome.
Having said that, outside of participants, gambling should be legal and largely without public regulation.
I wonder when colleges are going to start having their own university appointed staff "bookee" to manage these players bets?
If we had someone creative running our NIL program we would have a bookie on staff and the NIL program would give everyone $200 of "play money" that they could "gamble with" and if they turned that $200 into $5k of "play money" of course then they could cash it out for "real money." It's just for "fun." And the players wouldn't put any of their money in it.
And the coach was allowed to coach in the Orange Bowl after hiding a gun in his university office safe to shield one of his players who committed a crime with said gun.Remember a guy from our neighboring state was allowed to play in the Orange Bowl after he drug a girl down the stairs by her hair and beat the hell out of her. Let's have some perspective on crime and punishment NCAA.....
I assume they know if this is the case or not now.... The thing is it's a slippery slope how does one prove they don't have insider info? On campus word of mouth can be impossible to prove. He could be banging some of the female hoopers and it not be public knowledge. Not everything is done via text/phone and trackable.I think part of the basis for appeal will be that the NCAA did not put out its guidance on punishments until after the fact. Yes, he should have known better to bet, but to know you would get sat for a year is a different issue.
I am sure they will also argue extenuating circumstances. Basically, he had no inside info., placed a small bet, did it for fun. Basically no harm no foul. As someone else said, the punishment does not fit the crime.
I am glad KF is supporting his players here. The world has changed. The rules may need some updating in terms and application.
Remember a guy from our neighboring state was allowed to play in the Orange Bowl after he drug a girl down the stairs by her hair and beat the hell out of her. Let's have some perspective on crime and punishment NCAA.....
Pithy!That should make it into the handbook for players next year......
Damn fine cynicism. Totally agree.I appreciate the irony of a group of multimillionaires who work for a "non-profit" that generates billions in revenue annually off a basketball tournament lecturing us all on the integrity of the game as we patiently await our 2024 to see which of our new conference rivals we will play en route to collecting our university's $70-ish million paycheck for televised sports.
Rick Pitino used to be his school's pimpI wonder when colleges are going to start having their own university appointed staff "bookee" to manage these players bets?