Carver turned 35 this week, which isn't exactly old, but unlike Kinnick presents almost no historic value and is a flawed design that only continues to become more outdated by the year.
I realize Carver just had a multi-million dollar facelift, and any talks about a new arena are probably decades from now (unfortunately) but the flawed design of Carver offers no home court advantage and a general disinterest in attending games.
When in your opinion is a reasonable timeline for the University to consider building a new basketball arena?
I realize Carver just had a multi-million dollar facelift, and any talks about a new arena are probably decades from now (unfortunately) but the flawed design of Carver offers no home court advantage and a general disinterest in attending games.
When in your opinion is a reasonable timeline for the University to consider building a new basketball arena?