It's a team effort in success and failure BUT everyone that follows the sport acknowledges the absolute impact poor QB play has on the failure or success of the game
Mississippi State had a top 5 defense in the country last year and Nate played very well despite no run game and despite no Fant.The kid has gotten rocked against every defense with a pulse in the past 3 years. Inexplicably Urban just played some straight up vanilla defense against us that day and Hock and Fant just ate up their LBs. If this is like other games against good defenses, he's not even going to have time to set his feet before someone is in his face. The QB takes 100% of the blame for statistically poor games and losses, but the stinker losses have definitely been a team effort.
Mississippi State had a top 5 defense in the country last year and Nate played very well despite no run game and despite no Fant.
I love how you know so much about Ohio State’s defensive schemes and know it was their style of play that led to Iowa’s big day that day. Funny I remember a play where a Dline player was hanging onto NS and he kept his balance and delivered a strike for a touchdown. I remember a perfect pass to Fant for a touchdown.
You’ve created this narrative in your head and repeated it so many times in your head you actually believe it to be true.
The second TD you're talking about wasn't a pick play, it was a screen. Stanley gets the ball out to Easley right away, making it legal for Smith and Groeneweg to block downfield for him. The NFL runs the shit out of them these days (namely the Patriots and the Packers).Stanley played fine. He hit a 75 yard TD pass that accounting for over a third of his yards when MSU was sleeping on defense. He got a TD pass on an illegal pick play with good field position from the defense.
Stanley's performance against OSU was probably the best game I've ever personally witnessed an Iowa QB have. Maybe it's tied with the come back JVB orchestrated against Aaron Donald and Pitt. The kid hit everything in sight.
Sorry and yes it absolutely was in regards to his PLAY absolutely nothing to do with him as a person. I think he's a great guy and I don't even know him other than on interviews. Good point let me see if I can edit the title.Your thread title is different than your question . Title suggests Nate as person and the question posed refers to his play. I think Nate is a champ as a person. He has worked extremely hard and has represented his school well from what I can tell. As far as his play goes it depends on can the Oline protect him. If he gets time Saturday night I think he plays well. If they can't protect him it could get ugly. Still feeling this just isn't going our way. 24 10 Penn St.
Mississippi State had a top 5 defense in the country last year and Nate played very well despite no run game and despite no Fant.
I love how you know so much about Ohio State’s defensive schemes and know it was their style of play that led to Iowa’s big day that day. Funny I remember a play where a Dline player was hanging onto NS and he kept his balance and delivered a strike for a touchdown. I remember a perfect pass to Fant for a touchdown.
You’ve created this narrative in your head and repeated it so many times in your head you actually believe it to be true.
Just want to get the pulse of everyone to see if we think Nate will bounce back or basically be overwhelmed in yet another big time game in Prime Time. I'm praying he is the same QB that demolished OSU a couple seasons ago but I have my doubts.
trophy games do not matter.....got itLet's see
OOC record 11-0
Big Ten record 10-10
Trophy games 7-2
Bowl games 2-0
Division champs: 0
Conference champs 0
I would say that Stanley is the Champ of games that do not matter.