This seriously should not even be close. Trout in a rout. People are finally starting to realize that there is more to baseball than what is done in the batters box. Depending on whether you look at Baseballreference WAR or Fangraphs War, Trout has been either 4 or 3 wins better than Cabrera with 1 month less playing time. Saving runs defensively, and creating runs on the basebaths are worth just as much as runs created on hits. If Cabrera wins the Triple Crown he will get the MVP, but still will not deserve it by a long shot. Trout is seriously a once in a generation type player. He's 20 and he's by far the best player in the game.
This seriously should not even be close. Trout in a rout. People are finally starting to realize that there is more to baseball than what is done in the batters box. Depending on whether you look at Baseballreference WAR or Fangraphs War, Trout has been either 4 or 3 wins better than Cabrera with 1 month less playing time. Saving runs defensively, and creating runs on the basebaths are worth just as much as runs created on hits. If Cabrera wins the Triple Crown he will get the MVP, but still will not deserve it by a long shot. Trout is seriously a once in a generation type player. He's 20 and he's by far the best player in the game.
While I think Trout is really good, he is doing it on a loaded team that honestly underachieved. He hasn't played all season, which makes his numbers that much more intriguing, but a guy that wins the Triple crown and basically brings his team into the playoffs wins it. I see your argument but I think it is Cabrera this year.
Actually, this might help Trout's case. What if he started the season with the Angels? There were 6-14 when he came up on April 28. That means they are 83-57 since he came up (89-71 now). That's pretty good.
I know it. I said it makes it that much more intriguing and I think if he plays the whole year they make the playoffs and then i say he wins it, but he didn't and they aren't playing in Oct. so to me that is the difference.
Trout is also a phenomenal defender and baserunner. I could see it going either way but Cabrera will get it, the triple crown running is just too unique.
I see the argument for Cabrera. I just don't think it was Trout's fault the Angels didn't bring him up right away, but he did struggle a bit in 2011. It will be interesting and I think the Tigers making the playoffs may push Cabrera over the top.
Silly huh? Ok, well Trout won the triple crown too. He led in Runs, Stolen bases, and WAR. Now we're even on statistical leadership of 3 completely arbitrary statistics. Trout wins the tie breaker by being better at baseball. Trout saved his team 13.3 runs defensively while Cabrera cost his team 9.3 runs defensively. That's a 22 run difference defensively. Trout created 6.8 runs on the basebaths while Cabrera cost his team 2.3 runs by clogging the basebaths. That's a 9.1 run difference. You're talking about a 33 run differential when you bring in defense and baserunning which, last I checked, were very important parts of the game. The only silly thing is to ignore 2/3 of the game and give a guy the MVP because he led the league in 3 categories while being a liability in the field and on the basebaths.
Im a Tigers fan and have watched all but maybe 10 games.
Cabrera is a great third baseman hes not just some DH. He also runs the bases very smart for a big man. To say hes holding up his team on the base path is dumb. Also one of the better third basemen in the league. Yeah you dont see him rob home runs but doesnt mean any number of diving stops thats hes made hasnt saved the game.
Yes it is silly to say trout should win. Its not even close. The only reason for trout to win is if they want the rookie story.